Monday, January 30, 2012
What is the best way to weatherproof the plastic box for a motion sensor originally intended for indoor use?
The motion sensor in question is a cheap Quorum Passive Infrared Detector (RR-150/A-160/G4567) powered by a 9V DC battery that emits 5V for about 1 sec when activated. The trick is that I also want to solder leads to the battery contacts so that I can power it using a wall transformer. It comes in a plastic box that is totally unsealed; so far I have considered either using a glue gun to seal all seams and holes, or putting the whole thing inside another plastic (or plexiglass) box. For the moment I am most concerned about water leakage, but it is possible that temperature is an issue, too, I suppose. The sensor will be used in a temporary outdoor installation for six months this summer.What is the best way to weatherproof the plastic box for a motion sensor originally intended for indoor use?Get a tube of RTV. It's a kind of silicone caulk. Try hardware stores, auto parts stores, or maybe radio shack. Apply a smooth bead to every seam and to the hole where the wiring enters the box...and about 2 inches or so of the wiring. Don't force it in to deep or it may interfere with the sensor. It goes on sort of like caulk. After you apply a bead to the seams smooth it with a wet finger. The smoothing is mostly for cosmetic reasons but will also help make a good waterproof seal. Make certain when you mount it that it is several inches off the ground, to avoid water splashing up on to it, and as much out of the weather as possible.
What horizontal force must be applied by the worker to maintain the motion?
A stockroom worker pushes a box with mass 11.1kg on a horizontal surface with a constant speed of 4.00 . The coefIficient of kinetic friction between the box and the surface is 0.240m/s.What horizontal force must be applied by the worker to maintain the motion?If the force calculated in part (A) is removed, how far does the box slide before coming to rest?Take the free fall acceleration to be = 9.80 m/s^2What horizontal force must be applied by the worker to maintain the motion?Normal force is equal to gravity Fn = m*g. Friction force is Ff = 0.24*Fn = 0.24*m*g. For box to move with constant velocity applied force should be equal friction force: F = Ff = 0.24*m*g.
When force removed, net force is equal to Ff, so acceleration is a = Ff/m = 0.24*g. Sliding would go for D = v^2/2a = v^2/(0.48g)
When force removed, net force is equal to Ff, so acceleration is a = Ff/m = 0.24*g. Sliding would go for D = v^2/2a = v^2/(0.48g)
How does the human mind perceive motion?
Think of a waterfall.
Water, as you probably know, is constantly changing - the spray as the water droplets collide off one another, in the river bed where the water is drawn into the soil and roots of nearby plants, even the sounds of water slapping against rocks suggest motion.
But this can only be translated using a momentary image - i can only communicate these things though a single point at a time, like a photograph taken from a camera.
What would be difficult, would be to describe the vast picture of water, of evaporation and condensation and precipitation and the huge volume of water that takes up two thirds of this planet's surface mass.
Even then, i would fail to describe to you what motion is, or how motion occurs.
From a philosophical perspective, how does the human mind perceive motion?How does the human mind perceive motion?From Vanderbilt University:
The bigger and brighter an object, the harder it is to perceive its motion
Bigger and brighter isn't better, at least not when trying to view moving objects.
That is the counter-intuitive result of a study performed by a team of Vanderbilt psychologists which sheds new light on one of the most sophisticated processes performed by the brain: identifying and tracking moving objects.
"The bigger an object, the easier it is to see. But it is actually harder for people to determine the motion of objects larger than a tennis ball held at arms length than it is to gauge the motion of smaller objects," says Duje Tadin, first author of the paper on the study appearing in the July 17 issue of the journal Nature. Tadin is a graduate student in psychology at Vanderbilt and his co-authors are postdoctoral fellow Lee A. Gilroy and professors Joseph S. Lappin and Randolph Blake.
In the article, the researchers show that this unexpected result is due to the way in which visual signals are processed in the part of the brain known as the medial temporal visual area or MT, one of the 30-plus cortical centers involved in processing visual signals. Their findings support the hypothesis that the neurons in MT employ a mechanism called "center-surround receptive field organization." This same mechanism, which acts to highlight differences, is found in a number of other senses, including touch, hearing and smell.
In the visual system, the center-surround organization is a clever way that nature has developed for filtering out spurious signals caused by shifting patterns of light that fall on the retina that don't have anything to do with the movement of objects in the external world.
One of the most difficult things that the brain does is pick out objects from the visual background. Objects can differ from the background in a number of different ways, including texture, color, brightness, binocular displacement (the difference in image placement in each eye due to the distance between them) and motion. So the brain uses these and a number of other visual clues to pick out individual objects.
Information from the eyes goes first to the primary visual cortex at the very back of the brain. Here the information is separated into different characteristics, such as texture, color, brightnes and motion.
But how does the brain "see" motion? Just detecting shifting light patterns is not enough. Each time you shift your eyes or move your body, for example, the patterns on the retina change in ways that must be ignored. That is where the researchers think that center-surround receptive field organization comes in. Neurons in the primary visual cortex relay motion information to the neurons in MT, an area that Vanderbilt neuroscientist Jon Kaas helped discover. Experiments indicate that in the center of the visual field MT each neuron "monitors" an area that is the size of a tennis ball held at arms length. However, each neuron is not just affected by what happens in this central area. It is also influenced by the responses of the neurons that monitor a surrounding area about the size of a soccer ball (held at arms length).
The central-surround mechanism works as follows. Each neuron has a preferred direction: right, left, up, down, sideways, et cetera. If a neuron that prefers right motion detects a motion to the right while the neurons in its surround area are not registering any motion, then it fires vigorously. If the neurons in its surround area are stimulated by leftward motion, however, then it sometimes fires even more vigorously. But, if the surrounding neurons are also registering motions to the right, the neuron does not fire. This inhibitory effect is the hallmark of the center-surround mechanism.
"This is what causes moving objects to stand out distinctly even against moving backgrounds," Lappin comments, "But when objects are the size of the surround area or larger, then they tend to be treated as background motion and so are less visible."
The researchers discovered this effect when they analyzed the results of a series of psychophysical experiments in which human observers were asked to determine the direction of motion of patterns of varying speed, size and contrast that were flashed briefly on a screen. Not only did these experiments confirm that people have more trouble determining the motion of larger objects, they also showed that this effect was greatest in conditions of high contrast. The influence of surrounding neurons weakens as contrast levels decline.
"This shows that the visual system adapts to the amount of information available. When visual information is plentiful, it uses a differentiation strategy to identify moving objects. As light levels drop, however, it switches to an integration strategy that uses the available information more efficiently," says Lappin.
Once the researchers had successfully documented the odd side-effect of this motion-enhancing mechanism, tHow does the human mind perceive motion?your eyes are like a camera and when you wave pictures ware they look like there moving thats how your eyes do stuffHow does the human mind perceive motion?Actually the motion of an object is perceived by the lower neurological levels of the brain. The mind is that activity that you use to help you coordinate between what your senses perceive and what is needed to be done in order to coordinate with that motion.
Water, as you probably know, is constantly changing - the spray as the water droplets collide off one another, in the river bed where the water is drawn into the soil and roots of nearby plants, even the sounds of water slapping against rocks suggest motion.
But this can only be translated using a momentary image - i can only communicate these things though a single point at a time, like a photograph taken from a camera.
What would be difficult, would be to describe the vast picture of water, of evaporation and condensation and precipitation and the huge volume of water that takes up two thirds of this planet's surface mass.
Even then, i would fail to describe to you what motion is, or how motion occurs.
From a philosophical perspective, how does the human mind perceive motion?How does the human mind perceive motion?From Vanderbilt University:
The bigger and brighter an object, the harder it is to perceive its motion
Bigger and brighter isn't better, at least not when trying to view moving objects.
That is the counter-intuitive result of a study performed by a team of Vanderbilt psychologists which sheds new light on one of the most sophisticated processes performed by the brain: identifying and tracking moving objects.
"The bigger an object, the easier it is to see. But it is actually harder for people to determine the motion of objects larger than a tennis ball held at arms length than it is to gauge the motion of smaller objects," says Duje Tadin, first author of the paper on the study appearing in the July 17 issue of the journal Nature. Tadin is a graduate student in psychology at Vanderbilt and his co-authors are postdoctoral fellow Lee A. Gilroy and professors Joseph S. Lappin and Randolph Blake.
In the article, the researchers show that this unexpected result is due to the way in which visual signals are processed in the part of the brain known as the medial temporal visual area or MT, one of the 30-plus cortical centers involved in processing visual signals. Their findings support the hypothesis that the neurons in MT employ a mechanism called "center-surround receptive field organization." This same mechanism, which acts to highlight differences, is found in a number of other senses, including touch, hearing and smell.
In the visual system, the center-surround organization is a clever way that nature has developed for filtering out spurious signals caused by shifting patterns of light that fall on the retina that don't have anything to do with the movement of objects in the external world.
One of the most difficult things that the brain does is pick out objects from the visual background. Objects can differ from the background in a number of different ways, including texture, color, brightness, binocular displacement (the difference in image placement in each eye due to the distance between them) and motion. So the brain uses these and a number of other visual clues to pick out individual objects.
Information from the eyes goes first to the primary visual cortex at the very back of the brain. Here the information is separated into different characteristics, such as texture, color, brightnes and motion.
But how does the brain "see" motion? Just detecting shifting light patterns is not enough. Each time you shift your eyes or move your body, for example, the patterns on the retina change in ways that must be ignored. That is where the researchers think that center-surround receptive field organization comes in. Neurons in the primary visual cortex relay motion information to the neurons in MT, an area that Vanderbilt neuroscientist Jon Kaas helped discover. Experiments indicate that in the center of the visual field MT each neuron "monitors" an area that is the size of a tennis ball held at arms length. However, each neuron is not just affected by what happens in this central area. It is also influenced by the responses of the neurons that monitor a surrounding area about the size of a soccer ball (held at arms length).
The central-surround mechanism works as follows. Each neuron has a preferred direction: right, left, up, down, sideways, et cetera. If a neuron that prefers right motion detects a motion to the right while the neurons in its surround area are not registering any motion, then it fires vigorously. If the neurons in its surround area are stimulated by leftward motion, however, then it sometimes fires even more vigorously. But, if the surrounding neurons are also registering motions to the right, the neuron does not fire. This inhibitory effect is the hallmark of the center-surround mechanism.
"This is what causes moving objects to stand out distinctly even against moving backgrounds," Lappin comments, "But when objects are the size of the surround area or larger, then they tend to be treated as background motion and so are less visible."
The researchers discovered this effect when they analyzed the results of a series of psychophysical experiments in which human observers were asked to determine the direction of motion of patterns of varying speed, size and contrast that were flashed briefly on a screen. Not only did these experiments confirm that people have more trouble determining the motion of larger objects, they also showed that this effect was greatest in conditions of high contrast. The influence of surrounding neurons weakens as contrast levels decline.
"This shows that the visual system adapts to the amount of information available. When visual information is plentiful, it uses a differentiation strategy to identify moving objects. As light levels drop, however, it switches to an integration strategy that uses the available information more efficiently," says Lappin.
Once the researchers had successfully documented the odd side-effect of this motion-enhancing mechanism, tHow does the human mind perceive motion?your eyes are like a camera and when you wave pictures ware they look like there moving thats how your eyes do stuffHow does the human mind perceive motion?Actually the motion of an object is perceived by the lower neurological levels of the brain. The mind is that activity that you use to help you coordinate between what your senses perceive and what is needed to be done in order to coordinate with that motion.
What does the term "motion training" mean in regards to music and music teaching?
I would particularly like to know how this relates to violin or classical music. Could the Alexander Technique be considered as motion training? Thanks.What does the term "motion training" mean in regards to music and music teaching?possibly. i've never heard the term before but it could be relating to training your fingers to move with more agility...? but then again i'm just guessingedelbrock harcourt math
Do electrons have a net motion in the wires in alternating current?
Do electrons have a net motion in the wires in alternating current? Please, explain you answer!Do electrons have a net motion in the wires in alternating current?By definition no they do not since the current is constantly reversing it's direction back and forth. Only in DC where the direction of current flow is constantly in the same direction do the electrons have a net flow.
However, if you have something like a badly rectified AC signal (something that isn't equal in both directions) then you can get a net bias in one direction.Do electrons have a net motion in the wires in alternating current?Net motion? First time I've heard that one...
If you mean an overall direction of travel then, no, there is none. They travel a certain amount in one direction and then travel back the same distance (assuming the current is constant).
If there was one, how would you describe it? You cannot say 'towards the positive terminal' because the terminals keep switching.
However, if you have something like a badly rectified AC signal (something that isn't equal in both directions) then you can get a net bias in one direction.Do electrons have a net motion in the wires in alternating current?Net motion? First time I've heard that one...
If you mean an overall direction of travel then, no, there is none. They travel a certain amount in one direction and then travel back the same distance (assuming the current is constant).
If there was one, how would you describe it? You cannot say 'towards the positive terminal' because the terminals keep switching.
What is a good stop-motion animation program that I can download for free?
I need to find a good stop-motion program that I can easily download for free and make videos that can be uploaded to youtube or myspace. I want to use digital photos for my frames and not a camera.
Can anyone give me a link to a good program?What is a good stop-motion animation program that I can download for free?It's impossible to make stop motion without a camera, whatever software you use. If you already have your digital photos for your frames, you could easily edit them into a stop motion short through Windows Movie Maker, should should already be on your computer (if you're a PC user).What is a good stop-motion animation program that I can download for free?Check out Microsoft's Photo Story 3:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/detai鈥?/a>
I think this might be what you're looking for.
Can anyone give me a link to a good program?What is a good stop-motion animation program that I can download for free?It's impossible to make stop motion without a camera, whatever software you use. If you already have your digital photos for your frames, you could easily edit them into a stop motion short through Windows Movie Maker, should should already be on your computer (if you're a PC user).What is a good stop-motion animation program that I can download for free?Check out Microsoft's Photo Story 3:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/detai鈥?/a>
I think this might be what you're looking for.
What is a good stop-motion animation program that I can download for free?
I need to find a good stop-motion program that I can easily download for free and make videos that can be uploaded to youtube or myspace. I want to use digital photos for my frames and not a camera.
Can anyone give me a link to a good program?What is a good stop-motion animation program that I can download for free?It's impossible to make stop motion without a camera, whatever software you use. If you already have your digital photos for your frames, you could easily edit them into a stop motion short through Windows Movie Maker, should should already be on your computer (if you're a PC user).What is a good stop-motion animation program that I can download for free?Check out Microsoft's Photo Story 3:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/detai鈥?/a>
I think this might be what you're looking for.
Can anyone give me a link to a good program?What is a good stop-motion animation program that I can download for free?It's impossible to make stop motion without a camera, whatever software you use. If you already have your digital photos for your frames, you could easily edit them into a stop motion short through Windows Movie Maker, should should already be on your computer (if you're a PC user).What is a good stop-motion animation program that I can download for free?Check out Microsoft's Photo Story 3:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/detai鈥?/a>
I think this might be what you're looking for.
How do you calculate a rotating object's period of motion?
I am doing a lab and I have an object rotating in a uniform circle of radius 1.5 m at a rate of 25 revolutions in 20s.
I'm not even sure what period of motion means.How do you calculate a rotating object's period of motion?T=(2蟺)/w
where...
T is the period
w is angular velocity
Angular velocity is:
w=(revolutions*2蟺)/(change in time).
This simplifies to:
T=(change in time)/(revolutions)How do you calculate a rotating object's period of motion?Period of motion is the time it takes to complete one cycle.
It if completes 25 cycles (revolutions) in 20 seconds, then one cycle takes 20/25 = 0.8 seconds
I'm not even sure what period of motion means.How do you calculate a rotating object's period of motion?T=(2蟺)/w
where...
T is the period
w is angular velocity
Angular velocity is:
w=(revolutions*2蟺)/(change in time).
This simplifies to:
T=(change in time)/(revolutions)How do you calculate a rotating object's period of motion?Period of motion is the time it takes to complete one cycle.
It if completes 25 cycles (revolutions) in 20 seconds, then one cycle takes 20/25 = 0.8 seconds
How long does a court usually take to rule on a motion for dismissal of a case?
Like if the defendant files a motion for dismissal, removal or transfer, about how long would a judge take to issue a decision for an average not-too-complicated case? Any difference between federal and state (California) courts? I understand that it would vary, but I'm just looking for a typical time frame.How long does a court usually take to rule on a motion for dismissal of a case?The only "rule" in California is that a judge has to decide any matter submitted for decision within 90 days. However, that long a delay would hardly be typical for a routine trial court motion like yours. It is most likely that the judge would rule on it from the bench on the day it was heard. If he did take it under submission, I would expect the ruling within a few days.
If this is a trial court motion which does not require a hearing, then I would expect a ruling within a few weeks from the date that the last brief is filed.How long does a court usually take to rule on a motion for dismissal of a case?Three very different motions - dismissal, removal, or transfer, and civil or criminal court(?). Any motion must give the opposing party time to object to the motion, usually about 10 days after receiving the motion, then you have about 3-5 days to file a reply to the objection, and then the court can rule with or without a hearing. So generally about a minimum of 30 days or longer, with 60 days max, UNLESS you have filed a simultaneous motion for expedited review - for some semi-emergency type review action with very good cause for relief, then usually 10-20 days about.
A motion for removal (from that court) would probably be based on lack of court jurisdiction or prejudice by the location venue, and would be ruled upon sooner because the court cannot do anything else until jurisdiction is decided. If the court is taking too long to rule, you can file a Request For Decision On Motion To Dismiss again emphasizing the good cause reasons why a decision is needed.How long does a court usually take to rule on a motion for dismissal of a case?I have a similar question pending that I am not getting any answers on...anyways , I filed a Motion to dismiss in an order to show cause for indirect criminal contempt about 10 days before the hearing and the judge ruled on it at the end of the hearing . He still listened to all the testimony. Then did dismiss the case . I do know that some motions do have a time limit such as a motion to recuse is deemed granted if not ruled on within 30 days. Of course I am in Florida and speak from experience , and am not a lawyer..gas mileage calculator yamaha atv
If this is a trial court motion which does not require a hearing, then I would expect a ruling within a few weeks from the date that the last brief is filed.How long does a court usually take to rule on a motion for dismissal of a case?Three very different motions - dismissal, removal, or transfer, and civil or criminal court(?). Any motion must give the opposing party time to object to the motion, usually about 10 days after receiving the motion, then you have about 3-5 days to file a reply to the objection, and then the court can rule with or without a hearing. So generally about a minimum of 30 days or longer, with 60 days max, UNLESS you have filed a simultaneous motion for expedited review - for some semi-emergency type review action with very good cause for relief, then usually 10-20 days about.
A motion for removal (from that court) would probably be based on lack of court jurisdiction or prejudice by the location venue, and would be ruled upon sooner because the court cannot do anything else until jurisdiction is decided. If the court is taking too long to rule, you can file a Request For Decision On Motion To Dismiss again emphasizing the good cause reasons why a decision is needed.How long does a court usually take to rule on a motion for dismissal of a case?I have a similar question pending that I am not getting any answers on...anyways , I filed a Motion to dismiss in an order to show cause for indirect criminal contempt about 10 days before the hearing and the judge ruled on it at the end of the hearing . He still listened to all the testimony. Then did dismiss the case . I do know that some motions do have a time limit such as a motion to recuse is deemed granted if not ruled on within 30 days. Of course I am in Florida and speak from experience , and am not a lawyer..
Does an object in motion get longer or shorter as it approaches the speed of light?
According to Einstein's Theory of Relativity, what happens to an object in motion as it accelerates toward light speed? A 12-inch ruler, for example. Does it elongate or compress to a shorter length as it approaches the speed of light?Does an object in motion get longer or shorter as it approaches the speed of light?it elongates to an outside observer. but to the ruler itself, it stays the same size and everything around it begins to get slower and slower until it stops moving altogether (at the speed of light)
look up the theory on what happens when an object approaches a black hole. it will stretch to an outside observer because the closer you are to the event horizon, the faster you will accelerate. eventually the bit of the ruler closest to the hole will be accelerating at a faster rate than the farthest bit and it will stretch out.Does an object in motion get longer or shorter as it approaches the speed of light?
MidAtlantean2 said, "The object will appear to become shorter in the direction of motion to or from the observer."
Yes. An important word there is "appear." According to Einstein, If you attempt to measure the length of the object as it whizzes past you, you will get a smaller number than if you had measured it while you were riding along on top of it. Is it *REALLY* shorter? Well, that's where you have to decide what you mean by "real." It's the same object either way. It's world line in Minkowski spacetime is the same world line either way, so in one sense, no, it's not really shorter.
In another sense though, what is real to YOU is what you can measure, and if you try to measure the object when it is flying past you, any technique you use will come up with the shorter measurement. So, in that sense, the object really does get shorter the faster it moves.Does an object in motion get longer or shorter as it approaches the speed of light?The object will appear to become shorter in the direction of motion to or from the observer.
But it is important to understand that if you were with the moving object, you would not notice any change at all. Nor would an observer that was moving at a much lower speed in relation to this object. This is a RELATIVE effect" one that an observer will observe, but not something that 'happens' to the object in any observer-independent way. That is why it is called "relativity".
But do not think this means this is all a sort of illusion. If I am going near to light speed, the distance to a star will become shorter, AND I will travel though that shortened space at an appropriate speed. If the distance 'appears' to be halved - if the space is contracted by half - I will actually pass through it in half the time.
But this gets stranger still, since, if you were on the moving object, you would see exactly that the Earth, and not you, had ITS dimension contracted.Does an object in motion get longer or shorter as it approaches the speed of light?
It will compress.
its called length contraction.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hba鈥?/a>
It seems like it will elongate becasue from observation things that move fast appear to blur into along streak. This is an illusion that manifest becasue the human visual system cannot proecess data when the eyes are in rapid (aka sacadic eye movement) eye movement.Does an object in motion get longer or shorter as it approaches the speed of light?it elongates.
look up the theory on what happens when an object approaches a black hole. it will stretch to an outside observer because the closer you are to the event horizon, the faster you will accelerate. eventually the bit of the ruler closest to the hole will be accelerating at a faster rate than the farthest bit and it will stretch out.Does an object in motion get longer or shorter as it approaches the speed of light?
MidAtlantean2 said, "The object will appear to become shorter in the direction of motion to or from the observer."
Yes. An important word there is "appear." According to Einstein, If you attempt to measure the length of the object as it whizzes past you, you will get a smaller number than if you had measured it while you were riding along on top of it. Is it *REALLY* shorter? Well, that's where you have to decide what you mean by "real." It's the same object either way. It's world line in Minkowski spacetime is the same world line either way, so in one sense, no, it's not really shorter.
In another sense though, what is real to YOU is what you can measure, and if you try to measure the object when it is flying past you, any technique you use will come up with the shorter measurement. So, in that sense, the object really does get shorter the faster it moves.Does an object in motion get longer or shorter as it approaches the speed of light?The object will appear to become shorter in the direction of motion to or from the observer.
But it is important to understand that if you were with the moving object, you would not notice any change at all. Nor would an observer that was moving at a much lower speed in relation to this object. This is a RELATIVE effect" one that an observer will observe, but not something that 'happens' to the object in any observer-independent way. That is why it is called "relativity".
But do not think this means this is all a sort of illusion. If I am going near to light speed, the distance to a star will become shorter, AND I will travel though that shortened space at an appropriate speed. If the distance 'appears' to be halved - if the space is contracted by half - I will actually pass through it in half the time.
But this gets stranger still, since, if you were on the moving object, you would see exactly that the Earth, and not you, had ITS dimension contracted.Does an object in motion get longer or shorter as it approaches the speed of light?
It will compress.
its called length contraction.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hba鈥?/a>
It seems like it will elongate becasue from observation things that move fast appear to blur into along streak. This is an illusion that manifest becasue the human visual system cannot proecess data when the eyes are in rapid (aka sacadic eye movement) eye movement.Does an object in motion get longer or shorter as it approaches the speed of light?it elongates.
Why water sticks to the bottom of a bucket in circular motion?
I have read some stuff about circular motion and acceleration towards the center but everthing basically says what is happenning but i want to know why its happening. Please explain in detail.Why water sticks to the bottom of a bucket in circular motion?Friction between the different layers of water in the bucket is the reason.
The another name for this force is viscous force.
Since the layer of the bottom most water layers is sticking to the vessel, the friction is greater than other layers.
Between the layers of liquid the friction is constant.
Thus there is velocity gradient from bottom to the top of the water layer.
Under certain conditions, the lower most layer is at rest, and the velocity of layer In circular motion above the bottom surface is greater than this and so on for different layers.
Since frictional force is constant for different layers, the velocity difference between layers separated by same distances will be the same.Why water sticks to the bottom of a bucket in circular motion?What you read is called the centripetal force. This is the same force that keeps the moon rotation about the earth, the earth around the sun. The central force is a postulate of Newton.. And the way he derived it is as follows:
Imagine if you have a circular path, and a little mass is travelling in a sqare that fits on the circumference of the mass. If you assume that when the mass hits of the circle, there is perfectly elastic collision, such that the mass bounces off in the same reflective angle as the incident angle, the speed before and after are the same, but just the direction has changed. The "impulse" which is an instantaneous force required to change the direction, for all the 4 corners of the square is mv^2 / r. Now if you change the square into a regular polygon, same thing happens. In the limit of the polygon having infinite sides, which is a circle, the total force required to keep the particle with the same speed on the circular path is still mv^2/r pointing toward the center of the circle.Why water sticks to the bottom of a bucket in circular motion?force is exerted on it
The another name for this force is viscous force.
Since the layer of the bottom most water layers is sticking to the vessel, the friction is greater than other layers.
Between the layers of liquid the friction is constant.
Thus there is velocity gradient from bottom to the top of the water layer.
Under certain conditions, the lower most layer is at rest, and the velocity of layer In circular motion above the bottom surface is greater than this and so on for different layers.
Since frictional force is constant for different layers, the velocity difference between layers separated by same distances will be the same.Why water sticks to the bottom of a bucket in circular motion?What you read is called the centripetal force. This is the same force that keeps the moon rotation about the earth, the earth around the sun. The central force is a postulate of Newton.. And the way he derived it is as follows:
Imagine if you have a circular path, and a little mass is travelling in a sqare that fits on the circumference of the mass. If you assume that when the mass hits of the circle, there is perfectly elastic collision, such that the mass bounces off in the same reflective angle as the incident angle, the speed before and after are the same, but just the direction has changed. The "impulse" which is an instantaneous force required to change the direction, for all the 4 corners of the square is mv^2 / r. Now if you change the square into a regular polygon, same thing happens. In the limit of the polygon having infinite sides, which is a circle, the total force required to keep the particle with the same speed on the circular path is still mv^2/r pointing toward the center of the circle.Why water sticks to the bottom of a bucket in circular motion?force is exerted on it
Is it ever okay to use profanity when writing a court motion?
I'm trying to write a motion to bring before a judge, however, I must quote a statement which includes profanity that was stated by another individual. Will this make me look bad to the judge?Is it ever okay to use profanity when writing a court motion?I'm not licensed to practice law, but I'm guessing it's not acceptable in a court document unless it's key to the point of the motion. If necessary you can substitute (expletive) for the offensive word.Is it ever okay to use profanity when writing a court motion?
just remove it say f instead f*ck ect. under no circumstances use profanity when talking to any judge.Is it ever okay to use profanity when writing a court motion?"F--- you!" is pretty clear, don't you think?Is it ever okay to use profanity when writing a court motion?
Do it something like this: The man said, "(expletive deleted)" you.Is it ever okay to use profanity when writing a court motion?There are always ways to avoid using the actual word while keeping the meaning crystal clear.
just remove it say f instead f*ck ect. under no circumstances use profanity when talking to any judge.Is it ever okay to use profanity when writing a court motion?"F--- you!" is pretty clear, don't you think?Is it ever okay to use profanity when writing a court motion?
Do it something like this: The man said, "(expletive deleted)" you.Is it ever okay to use profanity when writing a court motion?There are always ways to avoid using the actual word while keeping the meaning crystal clear.
How many move controllers can you use for one motion sensor?
I currently have the motion sensor, 2 move motion controllers and 1 navigation controller. Can I buy 2 more move motion controllers to use on my system for 2 player action?How many move controllers can you use for one motion sensor?http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=A0oG7mCqgBZN3R4BHSpXNyoA;_ylc=X1MDMjc2NjY3OQRfcgMyBGFvAzAEZnIDeWZwLXQtNzQyBGhvc3RwdmlkA01CelJXVW9HN3Y2V1BnTTVUUlhhbEFhOEtTTFdwazBXZ0tvQUJTWHQEbl9ncHMDMARuX3ZwcwMwBG9yaWdpbgNzcnAEcXVlcnkDbWFueSBtb3ZlIGNvbnRyb2xsZXJzICAgICAgICAgIFNpdGU6ZnVsbC1mcmVlLWRvd25sb2Fkcy5jb20Ec2FvAzEEdnRlc3RpZANWSVAwMjE-?p=many+move+controllers++++++++++Site%3Afull-free-downloads.com%26amp;fr2=sb-top%26amp;fr=yfp-t-742
How to get past motion detectors?
My school has motion detectors that trip a silent alarm, that automaticly call the police. They are white rectangles with a black sensor and three little lights, green, orange, and red. When the red goes off the alarm is tripped. You could try to creep past them but that would take to long and too risky
Any suggestions on how to get past them?How to get past motion detectors?so this is probably 4 ur senior prank lol :) if ther on the ground you could probably jump over them. there is a website fo9r this where people discuss this here is the link; http://homokaasu.org/forum/thread.gas?Th鈥?/a>How to get past motion detectors?Haha, trying to break in?
I suggest that you somehow get into the ceiling. That's your safest bet because it is pretty much impossible to get past a motion detector. If you could figure out each detector's range, that would be very helpful....there may be some dead spots that they all don't reach. To do that you would have to figure out the brand and research it. And then it'll take some calculations to figure out where you can walk.international trucks mopar
Any suggestions on how to get past them?How to get past motion detectors?so this is probably 4 ur senior prank lol :) if ther on the ground you could probably jump over them. there is a website fo9r this where people discuss this here is the link; http://homokaasu.org/forum/thread.gas?Th鈥?/a>How to get past motion detectors?Haha, trying to break in?
I suggest that you somehow get into the ceiling. That's your safest bet because it is pretty much impossible to get past a motion detector. If you could figure out each detector's range, that would be very helpful....there may be some dead spots that they all don't reach. To do that you would have to figure out the brand and research it. And then it'll take some calculations to figure out where you can walk.
What is the difference in a court of law between a "petition" and a "motion?"?
What is the difference in a court of law between a "petition" and a "motion?" When would the petitioner submit a petition and when would the petitioner submit a motion? The differences? Thanks!What is the difference in a court of law between a "petition" and a "motion?"?They are pretty close; you are trying to persuade the court to do something in your favor. However, generally a motion usually needs a motion hearing, with oral arguments by both sides; a petition can generally be decided by the judge without an actual hearing.
What direction force would be necessary to keep an object moving in uniform circular motion?
What direction force would be necessary to keep an object moving in uniform circular motion counterclockwise?
Tangent to the circle counterclockwise
Tanget to the circle clockwise
Radially inward
Radially outward
No force is necessary.
Well I thought it was related to how acceleration always point toward the center of the circle in centripedal motion. I thin it's radially inward, but I'm hesitant since I don't know the reason why?What direction force would be necessary to keep an object moving in uniform circular motion?The centripetal force is needed to keep an object in a uniform circle. You have heard of centrifugal force right, that is the force that pulls a mass outward. The centripetal force is the reaction force (usually the force tension in the element holding the mass, usually a string) pulling the mass towards the center.What direction force would be necessary to keep an object moving in uniform circular motion?radially outward....
the forces balance each other to give net force zero
also work done is zero since cos 90 = 0
note: the rotation is being done in space ... so no gravitational or drag force is presentWhat direction force would be necessary to keep an object moving in uniform circular motion?Your thought process is correct.
Centripetal acceleration is what is holding the object in uniform circular motion. That acceleration must come from an applied force toward the center (radially inward).
Imagine swinging a stone on a string. While it feels as if the tension in the string is pulling radially outward, the stone is feeling that same tension pulling radially INWARD.
I'm sure you've also heard of "centrifugal force" which pushes radially outward, and may have heard it called an "imaginary" force. That force is no more "imaginary" than the force that seems to press you backwards into the seat in an accelerating car, but the actual force is pushing you forward. There is no force pulling you backward, it is just your own inertia trying to keep you moving at a constant speed in a straight line, while the car is applying a forward force. It only feels "backward" from your accelerating frame of reference.
Tangent to the circle counterclockwise
Tanget to the circle clockwise
Radially inward
Radially outward
No force is necessary.
Well I thought it was related to how acceleration always point toward the center of the circle in centripedal motion. I thin it's radially inward, but I'm hesitant since I don't know the reason why?What direction force would be necessary to keep an object moving in uniform circular motion?The centripetal force is needed to keep an object in a uniform circle. You have heard of centrifugal force right, that is the force that pulls a mass outward. The centripetal force is the reaction force (usually the force tension in the element holding the mass, usually a string) pulling the mass towards the center.What direction force would be necessary to keep an object moving in uniform circular motion?radially outward....
the forces balance each other to give net force zero
also work done is zero since cos 90 = 0
note: the rotation is being done in space ... so no gravitational or drag force is presentWhat direction force would be necessary to keep an object moving in uniform circular motion?Your thought process is correct.
Centripetal acceleration is what is holding the object in uniform circular motion. That acceleration must come from an applied force toward the center (radially inward).
Imagine swinging a stone on a string. While it feels as if the tension in the string is pulling radially outward, the stone is feeling that same tension pulling radially INWARD.
I'm sure you've also heard of "centrifugal force" which pushes radially outward, and may have heard it called an "imaginary" force. That force is no more "imaginary" than the force that seems to press you backwards into the seat in an accelerating car, but the actual force is pushing you forward. There is no force pulling you backward, it is just your own inertia trying to keep you moving at a constant speed in a straight line, while the car is applying a forward force. It only feels "backward" from your accelerating frame of reference.
Powerpoint feature - How do you hide an autoshape before executing a motion path?
I am trying to make a slice of pie fly out of a pie (plain circle) and end up in the corner of the slide. I can easily make the pie slice fly down in the corner but the problem is that when I run the slideshow the piece is already in the corner from the start, long before I start the motion path... So how do I hide the slice until I want it to fly out of the pie?Powerpoint feature - How do you hide an autoshape before executing a motion path?Two ways I can think of...
1) Redo your animation. Put the piece on the pie where it belongs, then add the motion path going down to the corner and position the red arrow where you want it to land.
2) It sounds like you might have put the piece in the corner, added the path and then reversed it? If that's the case, select the slice, Add Effect --%26gt; Entrance --%26gt; Appear. Then set that effect to On Click and set your motion path to With Previous.
Either one will hopefully do it for you!
1) Redo your animation. Put the piece on the pie where it belongs, then add the motion path going down to the corner and position the red arrow where you want it to land.
2) It sounds like you might have put the piece in the corner, added the path and then reversed it? If that's the case, select the slice, Add Effect --%26gt; Entrance --%26gt; Appear. Then set that effect to On Click and set your motion path to With Previous.
Either one will hopefully do it for you!
Can you own the motion picture films after shown in cinemas?
Can you own the entire motion pictures after they play in theaters? What do they do with the films anyway?Can you own the motion picture films after shown in cinemas?Films are rented to theaters, they return them to the distributer when the run is over. The distributor then rents the film to another theater.
Has anyone experienced chronic motion sickness even after returning to still ground?
A friend of mine has returned from a boat trip that had lasted approximately three months. It has been over a month now and he is still experiencing symptoms on motion sickness. From my friends perspective the ground moves as would the waves on the ocean.
Has anyone ever heard of this problem and is there a home remedy for this problem?Has anyone experienced chronic motion sickness even after returning to still ground?yes..he needs to see a Dr...it's an inner ear problem..he'll keep being dizzy till he gets some meds...(he can try some OTC stuff..Dramamine, etc) he might try something to empty his sinuses...(benadry, sudafed, actifed)
(sinuses+ears+throat+noses = trouble sometimes.)Has anyone experienced chronic motion sickness even after returning to still ground?
It's not unusual to have some lingering sensation of the boat rocking after a long cruise. I'm not sure if three months is too long or not. Your friend may have an ear infection or something else that is affecting his balance and prolonging the problem. It might be a good idea to see a doctor.Has anyone experienced chronic motion sickness even after returning to still ground?Yes, it usually happens when you've been on a boat, a plain or even an elevator and usually goes away within a few hours or sometimes days. If it doesn't go away you should see a doctor cause it may be vertigo or something more serious that should be looked into.Has anyone experienced chronic motion sickness even after returning to still ground?
Yes! I have experienced something very similar. What helped me was to take a vitamin B complex and Ginko Biloba everyday. Give it a week or two to see how well it works for you. Another good remedy in case you are feeling nausea is taking or eating ginger.
I hope you feel better soon. :-)Has anyone experienced chronic motion sickness even after returning to still ground?Could be an inner ear problem...he ought by now to have become accustomed to being back on dry land. Perhaps needs to get ears syringed.
I think usual time is about 10days for motion sickness to go, but different strokes for different folksHas anyone experienced chronic motion sickness even after returning to still ground?
Stop drinking.campers mercedes benz usa
Has anyone ever heard of this problem and is there a home remedy for this problem?Has anyone experienced chronic motion sickness even after returning to still ground?yes..he needs to see a Dr...it's an inner ear problem..he'll keep being dizzy till he gets some meds...(he can try some OTC stuff..Dramamine, etc) he might try something to empty his sinuses...(benadry, sudafed, actifed)
(sinuses+ears+throat+noses = trouble sometimes.)Has anyone experienced chronic motion sickness even after returning to still ground?
It's not unusual to have some lingering sensation of the boat rocking after a long cruise. I'm not sure if three months is too long or not. Your friend may have an ear infection or something else that is affecting his balance and prolonging the problem. It might be a good idea to see a doctor.Has anyone experienced chronic motion sickness even after returning to still ground?Yes, it usually happens when you've been on a boat, a plain or even an elevator and usually goes away within a few hours or sometimes days. If it doesn't go away you should see a doctor cause it may be vertigo or something more serious that should be looked into.Has anyone experienced chronic motion sickness even after returning to still ground?
Yes! I have experienced something very similar. What helped me was to take a vitamin B complex and Ginko Biloba everyday. Give it a week or two to see how well it works for you. Another good remedy in case you are feeling nausea is taking or eating ginger.
I hope you feel better soon. :-)Has anyone experienced chronic motion sickness even after returning to still ground?Could be an inner ear problem...he ought by now to have become accustomed to being back on dry land. Perhaps needs to get ears syringed.
I think usual time is about 10days for motion sickness to go, but different strokes for different folksHas anyone experienced chronic motion sickness even after returning to still ground?
Stop drinking.
What direction force would be necessary to keep an object moving in uniform circular motion?
What direction force would be necessary to keep an object moving in uniform circular motion counterclockwise?
Tangent to the circle counterclockwise
Tanget to the circle clockwise
Radially inward
Radially outward
No force is necessary.
Well I thought it was related to how acceleration always point toward the center of the circle in centripedal motion. I thin it's radially inward, but I'm hesitant since I don't know the reason why?What direction force would be necessary to keep an object moving in uniform circular motion?radially inward
Tangent to the circle counterclockwise
Tanget to the circle clockwise
Radially inward
Radially outward
No force is necessary.
Well I thought it was related to how acceleration always point toward the center of the circle in centripedal motion. I thin it's radially inward, but I'm hesitant since I don't know the reason why?What direction force would be necessary to keep an object moving in uniform circular motion?radially inward
Was Thomas Edison the INVENTOR or the CO-INVENTOR of the motion picture camera?
He did have something to do with the motion picture camera, right?Was Thomas Edison the INVENTOR or the CO-INVENTOR of the motion picture camera?The Cinematographe made motion pictures very popular, and it could be better be said that Lumiere's invention began the motion picture era. In 1895, Lumiere and his brother were the first to present projected, moving, photographic, pictures to a paying audience of more that one person.
The Lumiere brothers were not the first to project film. In 1891, the Edison company successfully demonstrated the Kinetoscope, which enabled one person at a time to view moving pictures.
Later in 1896, Edison showed his improved Vitascope projector and it was the first commercially, successful, projector in the U.S..
"The cinema is an invention without a future" - Louis Lumi猫re WOW! wasn't Louis a man of vision. (no pun intended.)Was Thomas Edison the INVENTOR or the CO-INVENTOR of the motion picture camera?Edison was granted a patent for the motion picture camera or "Kinetograph". He did the electromechanical design, while his employee W.K.L. Dickson, a photographer, worked on the photographic and optical development. Much of the credit for the invention belongs to Dickson.
The Lumiere brothers were not the first to project film. In 1891, the Edison company successfully demonstrated the Kinetoscope, which enabled one person at a time to view moving pictures.
Later in 1896, Edison showed his improved Vitascope projector and it was the first commercially, successful, projector in the U.S..
"The cinema is an invention without a future" - Louis Lumi猫re WOW! wasn't Louis a man of vision. (no pun intended.)Was Thomas Edison the INVENTOR or the CO-INVENTOR of the motion picture camera?Edison was granted a patent for the motion picture camera or "Kinetograph". He did the electromechanical design, while his employee W.K.L. Dickson, a photographer, worked on the photographic and optical development. Much of the credit for the invention belongs to Dickson.
How to solve a motion equation word problem?
A cat jumps from a ledge that is meters off the ground to catch a hummingbird. While in the air, the center of mass of his motion is at a height given by the equation
h(t)=Ho+Vo*t-9.8*t^2
which holds right until he lands on the ground. He lands with a velocity of -7 meters per second, 1.2 seconds after starting the jump.
1) how high is the ledge?
2) what is the initial velocity?How to solve a motion equation word problem?2) h(t) = Ho + Vot - 9.8t^2
h'(t) = v(t) = Vo - 19.6t
-7 = Vo - 19.6(1.2)
-7 + 23.52 = Vo
16.52 = Vo
The initial velocity is 16.52 m/sec.
1) h(t) = Ho + 16.52t - 9.8t^2
0 = Ho - 15.52(1.2) - 9.8(1.2)^2
32.736 = Ho
The ledge is 32.736 m above the ground.
Since a = 9.8 m/sec^2, shouldn't the equation be h(t) = Ho + Vot - 4.9t^2?How to solve a motion equation word problem?Ho is the height of the ledge. So solve for Ho by plugging your know values into the given equation:
h(1.2) = 0 = Ho + Vo*1.2 - 9.8(1.2^2)
The height at t = 1.2 is zero because the cat lands on the ground.
If you've done derivatives, you solve the equation by taking the derivative of the height which gives you the vertical velocity as a function of time. If you haven't done derivatives, I would assume the initial velocity of the cat is zero. Hence Vo = 0. Or take the derivative:
h'(t) = V(t)
V(t) = Vo - 2*9.8t
Now you know that at t = 1.2 the velocity is -7 ms-1. So:
-7 + 2*9.8 = Vo
Now plug that back into the first equation and solve for the initial height.
h(t)=Ho+Vo*t-9.8*t^2
which holds right until he lands on the ground. He lands with a velocity of -7 meters per second, 1.2 seconds after starting the jump.
1) how high is the ledge?
2) what is the initial velocity?How to solve a motion equation word problem?2) h(t) = Ho + Vot - 9.8t^2
h'(t) = v(t) = Vo - 19.6t
-7 = Vo - 19.6(1.2)
-7 + 23.52 = Vo
16.52 = Vo
The initial velocity is 16.52 m/sec.
1) h(t) = Ho + 16.52t - 9.8t^2
0 = Ho - 15.52(1.2) - 9.8(1.2)^2
32.736 = Ho
The ledge is 32.736 m above the ground.
Since a = 9.8 m/sec^2, shouldn't the equation be h(t) = Ho + Vot - 4.9t^2?How to solve a motion equation word problem?Ho is the height of the ledge. So solve for Ho by plugging your know values into the given equation:
h(1.2) = 0 = Ho + Vo*1.2 - 9.8(1.2^2)
The height at t = 1.2 is zero because the cat lands on the ground.
If you've done derivatives, you solve the equation by taking the derivative of the height which gives you the vertical velocity as a function of time. If you haven't done derivatives, I would assume the initial velocity of the cat is zero. Hence Vo = 0. Or take the derivative:
h'(t) = V(t)
V(t) = Vo - 2*9.8t
Now you know that at t = 1.2 the velocity is -7 ms-1. So:
-7 + 2*9.8 = Vo
Now plug that back into the first equation and solve for the initial height.
How to download BBC motion gallery clips to be able to edit in Sony vegas?
I want to download BBC motion gallery clips so I can use them in Sony Vegas. How do I do that?How to download BBC motion gallery clips to be able to edit in Sony vegas?Once you obtain the clips, you import them into your video editing program just like you would for video clips.
The link below will assist you in obtaining the motion graphic clips:
The link below will assist you in obtaining the motion graphic clips:
How does a perpetual motion machine reverse entropy or time?
I know it's not possible but, if you built a perpetual motion machine how would it reverse entropy or time? How would the process go about? negative comments aren't allowed. Please provide good sources and info. Thank you.How does a perpetual motion machine reverse entropy or time?Actually, it is more a requisite than an effect.
If there was a perpetual motion machine, then it would have to either reverse entropy or time in order to work.
Since you cannot reverse entropy or time, then perpetual motion machines cannot exist.How does a perpetual motion machine reverse entropy or time?It would not reverse entropy. It just would not create any entropy. 100% of the energy IN would do useful work. Then 100% of the work OUT would go to create energy. And so on.
The 2nd Law of Thermodynanics is what causes time to move in one direction. Time moves in the direction that results in the total entropy of the universe increasing. This may be the only reason needed to prevent time travel to the past. We would need to decrease the total entropy of the universe to the state it was in in the past and that cannot be done. Any energy used to drive the time machine increases the entropy of the universe and the machine moves into the futureHow does a perpetual motion machine reverse entropy or time?You question is non-sense! If it is not possible, how do you want someone to know how would the machine work?north carolina dmv russian translator
If there was a perpetual motion machine, then it would have to either reverse entropy or time in order to work.
Since you cannot reverse entropy or time, then perpetual motion machines cannot exist.How does a perpetual motion machine reverse entropy or time?It would not reverse entropy. It just would not create any entropy. 100% of the energy IN would do useful work. Then 100% of the work OUT would go to create energy. And so on.
The 2nd Law of Thermodynanics is what causes time to move in one direction. Time moves in the direction that results in the total entropy of the universe increasing. This may be the only reason needed to prevent time travel to the past. We would need to decrease the total entropy of the universe to the state it was in in the past and that cannot be done. Any energy used to drive the time machine increases the entropy of the universe and the machine moves into the futureHow does a perpetual motion machine reverse entropy or time?You question is non-sense! If it is not possible, how do you want someone to know how would the machine work?
How come Kinect is motion sensored but PS Move needs controllers?
How come Kinect for xbox 360 is so much far a head in technology by using voice commands and voice recognition and also is motion sensored. But the PS Move needs controllers like the Wii and does not even compete with Kinect?How come Kinect is motion sensored but PS Move needs controllers?Neither company was privy to what the other was developing at the time.
Sony and Microsoft simply wanted to imitate the Wii.
Kinect and Move are there offerings.How come Kinect is motion sensored but PS Move needs controllers?
PS move: holding a dildo
Kinect: you are the dildo
Kinect is a gimmick, my friend has it and he hates it, he says it is so sensitive that when your playing a game and something or someone comes behind you, it will detect it, even if it goes so quick!
PS Move is better because the motion controllers make you control what is going on easy, as with Kinect it is harder because sometimes that stupid camera messes everything.
PS Move: It Only does Everything
KInect: It Only f***s up EverythingHow come Kinect is motion sensored but PS Move needs controllers?Well here it goes. . . .
Kinect can do full body motion b/c it has several cameras including an infrared camera (Infrared is heat, which is a type of radiation similar to visible light its just our eyes can't see infrared, yet like the sun we walk around glowing of light. . . infrared) The kinect uses these cameras to make a 3d map of the entire room and you. So the kinect knows every movement, it can read how fast and where and how you kick jump, punch anything. Thus kinect tracks what you do and puts your body into a game and computes how you interact with this virtual environment.
Trust me amazing games are coming in the future as they learn how to better work your movements in the real world as it would act in the virtual world.
Whereas the move is just a 2d camera and can only read what you do in 2d space, thus it just knows if your move left or right, but can't see if you punch or kick.
So this is where the move controller that looks like a dildo comes into play, see the glowing vibrator ball at the end that looks much like something one would see in a sex shop actually helps the "move" see where your arms are in 3d space. It does so by seeing how small the move gets as it moves farther away and how much bigger it gets as it gets closer. This is why everytime you want to play a game you need to "calibrate" the move so it knows how large it is given the distance your standing.How come Kinect is motion sensored but PS Move needs controllers?
Cuz microsoft is being a little ***** and trying to tell us that they are the best people in the whole entire world. TBH, i think move and wii are probably better because motion control DOES NOT work for very long, where as sensers are more reliable. Something bad happens with motion control, but nothin really bad wit sensors to controller
Sony and Microsoft simply wanted to imitate the Wii.
Kinect and Move are there offerings.How come Kinect is motion sensored but PS Move needs controllers?
PS move: holding a dildo
Kinect: you are the dildo
Report Abuse
How come Kinect is motion sensored but PS Move needs controllers?there also a different in camera technology that allows the kinect to do a lot more the then the ps eye camera, Kinect has three camera one is just a camera like the kinect which is designed for video and pictures. the other two camera give depth perception and 3d field of view of your room %26amp; bodyReport Abuse
How come Kinect is motion sensored but PS Move needs controllers?Kinect is a gimmick, my friend has it and he hates it, he says it is so sensitive that when your playing a game and something or someone comes behind you, it will detect it, even if it goes so quick!
PS Move is better because the motion controllers make you control what is going on easy, as with Kinect it is harder because sometimes that stupid camera messes everything.
PS Move: It Only does Everything
KInect: It Only f***s up EverythingHow come Kinect is motion sensored but PS Move needs controllers?Well here it goes. . . .
Kinect can do full body motion b/c it has several cameras including an infrared camera (Infrared is heat, which is a type of radiation similar to visible light its just our eyes can't see infrared, yet like the sun we walk around glowing of light. . . infrared) The kinect uses these cameras to make a 3d map of the entire room and you. So the kinect knows every movement, it can read how fast and where and how you kick jump, punch anything. Thus kinect tracks what you do and puts your body into a game and computes how you interact with this virtual environment.
Trust me amazing games are coming in the future as they learn how to better work your movements in the real world as it would act in the virtual world.
Whereas the move is just a 2d camera and can only read what you do in 2d space, thus it just knows if your move left or right, but can't see if you punch or kick.
So this is where the move controller that looks like a dildo comes into play, see the glowing vibrator ball at the end that looks much like something one would see in a sex shop actually helps the "move" see where your arms are in 3d space. It does so by seeing how small the move gets as it moves farther away and how much bigger it gets as it gets closer. This is why everytime you want to play a game you need to "calibrate" the move so it knows how large it is given the distance your standing.How come Kinect is motion sensored but PS Move needs controllers?
Cuz microsoft is being a little ***** and trying to tell us that they are the best people in the whole entire world. TBH, i think move and wii are probably better because motion control DOES NOT work for very long, where as sensers are more reliable. Something bad happens with motion control, but nothin really bad wit sensors to controller
How does the Jet engine reaction would help in getting the motion?
Jet Engine get its forward motion because of the reaction of the exhausted high speed gases.But for giving reaction there should be some medium at the rear end. In air it is OK that air is itself a medium to push the engine forward. But I have heard that rocket engine even work in the vacuum. In vacuum what pushes the rocket engine forward if there is no medium in which the exhausted gases are pushed.How does the Jet engine reaction would help in getting the motion?Consider Newton's third law of motion - every ACTION has an opposite and equal REACTION.
Burning of jet fuel with in a jet engine has the ACTION of emitting the "exhaust gases" in one direction. The REACTION is the jet engine moving in the opposite direction, which is known as thrust. It is measured in EPR (exhaust pressure ratio), which is the difference in pressure between the front (intake) and the rear (exhaust) of the engine.
Imagine standing in a small boat with a big rock. If you throw the rock, what is going to happen to the boat? It is going to move in the direction opposite of where you threw the rock. That is a good example of an ACTION (throwing the rock) and a REACTION (the boat moving in the opposite direction), and applies to the thrust generated by a jet engine. The bigger the rock and the harder you throw it, the more the boat is going to move, even though you are not physically "pushing" against any solid medium.
Very little thrust is generated by the exhaust pressure against the medium of the atmosphere, as there just isn't enough mass in the atmosphere - especially at 35,000 feet! Same applies to a rocket engine in the vacuum of space.How does the Jet engine reaction would help in getting the motion?
Say what???? I think what you're trying state is that the expanding gasses need something to push against to propel a rocket forward. And they do you're just not looking at it correctly. In the vacuum of space a rocket engine produces thrust by the rapid expansion of combustion. This expansion is directed out through the rocket nozzle. Thrust is achieved by the equal and opposite reaction of an action (expanding gasses). The gasses go one way, out the nozzle, and this pushes the engine the other way. The gasses do not need some external medium to collide with. Let me think of a good analogy. It's like a toy water rocket. You pump it up with just air and it will just pop off the launcher about a foot, fizzle, and drop to the ground. Air has little mass so there is not much reaction energy. Now, add a little water to the rocket then pump up a air charge behind it. Water has considerable more mass than air thus much more reaction energy. Now the air charge will push the water out the nozzle and produce more reaction forcing the water rocket hundreds of feet into the air. Both air and water charges in this demonstration are pushing against air as you stated in your question but water will prevail. So as you can see it has nothing to do with the collision of materials behind the engine, it is reaction energy that produces thrust.How does the Jet engine reaction would help in getting the motion?I think you misunderstand the concept of jet propulsion. The ability of a jet to generate thrust is entirely related to the jet acting on the components of the engine (momentum transfer), not the surrounding medium (if any). The main component of thrust from most engines is derived from the velocity and mass flow rate of the jet. A minor component will be generated if the jet is at a higher pressure than the surrounding medium (this is called pressure thrust). Again, note that pressure thrust does not require an atmosphere, a rocket engine in space (essentially zero pressure) can also generate pressure thrust.How does the Jet engine reaction would help in getting the motion?
the ancient Greeks though air behind the arrow had to "push it forward"
in the 1650s Newton and others understood that things that are moving CONTINUE to move unless something some Force changes the motion
gravity pulls down. the air across the wings moves down and the REACTION of the air against the wing pushes up to balance
a Propeller is a rotating wing, it pushes air back and the air pushes the propeller forward
A rocket is a container with burning fuel. the exhaust material moves backward and the container moves forward.. It DOES NOT PUSH against the outside air. that is why it works in space
in physics is is called Conservation of Momentum or action and reaction
Most people get confused about this. if you take a science class, especially physics it becomes understandable
e-m my icon if you have more Q. it takes some explanationHow does the Jet engine reaction would help in getting the motion?The law of action and reaction works even in a vacuum. It doesn't need anything to "push against." That's why it works for rockets. And it works for jet engines, too, and doesn't depend on surrounding air.
Burning of jet fuel with in a jet engine has the ACTION of emitting the "exhaust gases" in one direction. The REACTION is the jet engine moving in the opposite direction, which is known as thrust. It is measured in EPR (exhaust pressure ratio), which is the difference in pressure between the front (intake) and the rear (exhaust) of the engine.
Imagine standing in a small boat with a big rock. If you throw the rock, what is going to happen to the boat? It is going to move in the direction opposite of where you threw the rock. That is a good example of an ACTION (throwing the rock) and a REACTION (the boat moving in the opposite direction), and applies to the thrust generated by a jet engine. The bigger the rock and the harder you throw it, the more the boat is going to move, even though you are not physically "pushing" against any solid medium.
Very little thrust is generated by the exhaust pressure against the medium of the atmosphere, as there just isn't enough mass in the atmosphere - especially at 35,000 feet! Same applies to a rocket engine in the vacuum of space.How does the Jet engine reaction would help in getting the motion?
Say what???? I think what you're trying state is that the expanding gasses need something to push against to propel a rocket forward. And they do you're just not looking at it correctly. In the vacuum of space a rocket engine produces thrust by the rapid expansion of combustion. This expansion is directed out through the rocket nozzle. Thrust is achieved by the equal and opposite reaction of an action (expanding gasses). The gasses go one way, out the nozzle, and this pushes the engine the other way. The gasses do not need some external medium to collide with. Let me think of a good analogy. It's like a toy water rocket. You pump it up with just air and it will just pop off the launcher about a foot, fizzle, and drop to the ground. Air has little mass so there is not much reaction energy. Now, add a little water to the rocket then pump up a air charge behind it. Water has considerable more mass than air thus much more reaction energy. Now the air charge will push the water out the nozzle and produce more reaction forcing the water rocket hundreds of feet into the air. Both air and water charges in this demonstration are pushing against air as you stated in your question but water will prevail. So as you can see it has nothing to do with the collision of materials behind the engine, it is reaction energy that produces thrust.How does the Jet engine reaction would help in getting the motion?I think you misunderstand the concept of jet propulsion. The ability of a jet to generate thrust is entirely related to the jet acting on the components of the engine (momentum transfer), not the surrounding medium (if any). The main component of thrust from most engines is derived from the velocity and mass flow rate of the jet. A minor component will be generated if the jet is at a higher pressure than the surrounding medium (this is called pressure thrust). Again, note that pressure thrust does not require an atmosphere, a rocket engine in space (essentially zero pressure) can also generate pressure thrust.How does the Jet engine reaction would help in getting the motion?
the ancient Greeks though air behind the arrow had to "push it forward"
in the 1650s Newton and others understood that things that are moving CONTINUE to move unless something some Force changes the motion
gravity pulls down. the air across the wings moves down and the REACTION of the air against the wing pushes up to balance
a Propeller is a rotating wing, it pushes air back and the air pushes the propeller forward
A rocket is a container with burning fuel. the exhaust material moves backward and the container moves forward.. It DOES NOT PUSH against the outside air. that is why it works in space
in physics is is called Conservation of Momentum or action and reaction
Most people get confused about this. if you take a science class, especially physics it becomes understandable
e-m my icon if you have more Q. it takes some explanationHow does the Jet engine reaction would help in getting the motion?The law of action and reaction works even in a vacuum. It doesn't need anything to "push against." That's why it works for rockets. And it works for jet engines, too, and doesn't depend on surrounding air.
Does motion sickness medication work for roller coasters?
I'm headed to Hershey Park on Sunday, and I intend to ride as many roller coasters as I possibly can. I'm not one to get motion sickness, but I was wondering if taking motion sickness medication would help should I start to feel a little sick. Anyone who knows the answer or has personal experience let me know. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!Does motion sickness medication work for roller coasters?They work on some people but not on others.
I get very motion sick sometimes, and what works for me is these motion sickness wristbands. They have little metal things that dig into your wrist a little, and they help with motion sickness. I don't know how they work, but they're really helpful.Does motion sickness medication work for roller coasters?
We do the Dramamine thing, and they help sometimes. It really depends on the rides though. My husband and I have no problems with regular coasters, but the ones with loops make both of us sick these days, but we still love them.
The key is timing. Don't hit everything at once. Take breaks in between the big twisting coasters. When you start feeling sick, stop riding and do something else like watching some shows, shopping, or eating lunch or a light snack. When you feel better, get back to riding the rides.Does motion sickness medication work for roller coasters?I get motion sickness easily but in my experience, the pills don't always work. I know that ginger works well for nausea though. Perhaps you could bring a little bag of ginger snaps just in case? That usually works for me. Good luck!Does motion sickness medication work for roller coasters?
yes, I always take Dramimine before I go to amusement parks - - it really helps.
:o)Does motion sickness medication work for roller coasters?yes, i'm a total loser who needs to pop dramamine before going on ridesDoes motion sickness medication work for roller coasters?
wat da **** hoe
I get very motion sick sometimes, and what works for me is these motion sickness wristbands. They have little metal things that dig into your wrist a little, and they help with motion sickness. I don't know how they work, but they're really helpful.Does motion sickness medication work for roller coasters?
We do the Dramamine thing, and they help sometimes. It really depends on the rides though. My husband and I have no problems with regular coasters, but the ones with loops make both of us sick these days, but we still love them.
The key is timing. Don't hit everything at once. Take breaks in between the big twisting coasters. When you start feeling sick, stop riding and do something else like watching some shows, shopping, or eating lunch or a light snack. When you feel better, get back to riding the rides.Does motion sickness medication work for roller coasters?I get motion sickness easily but in my experience, the pills don't always work. I know that ginger works well for nausea though. Perhaps you could bring a little bag of ginger snaps just in case? That usually works for me. Good luck!Does motion sickness medication work for roller coasters?
yes, I always take Dramimine before I go to amusement parks - - it really helps.
:o)Does motion sickness medication work for roller coasters?yes, i'm a total loser who needs to pop dramamine before going on ridesDoes motion sickness medication work for roller coasters?
wat da **** hoe
How much does Wii sports resort cost and what is Wii motion Plus?
How much does Wii Sports Resort cost? I don't want any extra things, just that game.
And also what is Wii motion plus and what does it do?How much does Wii sports resort cost and what is Wii motion Plus?You can't buy a new Wii Sports Resort without the Wii Motion Plus because Wii Sports Resort requires the Motion Plus. It's 50 bucks. You can buy it used for about 30 bucks.
Wii Motion Plus is supposed to be able to understand more complex motions, such as circular motion. It also renders it on the screen faster.
And also what is Wii motion plus and what does it do?How much does Wii sports resort cost and what is Wii motion Plus?You can't buy a new Wii Sports Resort without the Wii Motion Plus because Wii Sports Resort requires the Motion Plus. It's 50 bucks. You can buy it used for about 30 bucks.
Wii Motion Plus is supposed to be able to understand more complex motions, such as circular motion. It also renders it on the screen faster.
How does a perpetual motion machine reverse entropy or time?
I know it's not possible but, if you built a perpetual motion machine how would it reverse entropy or time? How would the process go about? negative comments aren't allowed. Please provide good sources and info. Thank you.How does a perpetual motion machine reverse entropy or time?In the mid 1800s, the concept of the perpetual motion machine became fashionable. Basically, it is a machine that when once started, will continue to produce useful work with no further addition of or input of additional energy. The US patent office was overwhelmed with patent applications for such machines, and there were a lot of hard feelings and wasting of time and energy in the arguing over the rejection of all of these patent applications. Until the US patent director had a brainstorm. He started requiring all applicants to submit a functioning working model. Patent applications for perpetual motion machines dropped to ZERO!! This is because they are impossible(duh).
You simply cannot continue to extract useful work from something that requires no additional energy input. Energy is a commodity like water or copper or oxygen or anything else. All so-called perpetual motion machines will run down and stop. You can't make a bottle that gives an unlimited supply of water; you can't make an oil well that gives an unlimited supply of gasoline, and you can't make a car that goes forever without adding any additional fuel to the gas tank. It is stupid to think that you can. Even the Sun will burn out some day.How does a perpetual motion machine reverse entropy or time?
Because perpetual motion is a system with infinite motion which is impossible. Those desktop "perpetual motion" displays operate by the transference of motion so they do not violate entropy, but something with infinite motion would never gain disorder of the system which is what entropy is and would in turn violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics, it doesn't happen. They wouldn't reverse time, but the there would be no entropy which is impossible because any time you move something you disturb the system and outside systems as well, increasing entropy. You can't reverse entropy because that would imply reversing time which violates causality. So, the fact that entropy can't be reversed fundamentally boils down to causality.How does a perpetual motion machine reverse entropy or time?Because In theory entropy can only increase in an open system over time.
You can think of "potential energy" also as "potential entropy". Using state functions (you don;t wanna get in to it) you can determine the amount of entropy created by changing a given state (ball on top of a hill) to another state (a ball on the bottom of a hill). The ball at the bottom of the hill will have a higher thermodynamic entropy. (if you wanna get in to here ya go: http://pcp.lanl.gov/ENTRTHER.html )
Anything that can reduce entropy in an open system is... well is NOT.. period. So creating a lower entropy state (adding energy to system) without its corresponding+ increase in entropy someplace else.. is a no go.
You can push the ball back up the hill.. But you need to turn calories in to kinetic motion and heat to do it. Perpetual motion "teleports" that ball back to the top of the hill without using additional energy-entropy.How does a perpetual motion machine reverse entropy or time?
Entropy is a very hard concept to grasp for a lot of people. It is sometimes explained as a measure of disorder in a system. That's a pretty good explanation for most applications, but for thermodynamics, it is insufficient. Entropy is a measure of how much of the energy in a given system is not available to do work.
Let's say you have two balloons, one green that's blown up, and the other red that's not blown up, and the two are joined at the nozzles with a tube. Now keep in mind that we could put a small propeller inside the tube so that when air flows from the filled balloon to the empty one, the propeller spins and does work.
Now, before you release the air in the green balloon, the mass of air that's inside the balloon has an internal energy U. Some of this energy can be used to spin the propeller, and some cannot.
Let's imagine that you release the air in the green balloon, and as the air spins the propeller, the propeller does some amount of work. The important thing to recognize is that you cannot empty out ALL of the air from the green balloon to the red balloon. The air pressures will equalize and that's when the air will stop moving through the tube, and the propeller will stop doing work. The system has gone from a state where there was no equilibrium, to a state where it is balanced, but no further.
In other words, you cannot use all of the internal energy U, to spin that propeller. Only some of the energy can be used. The energy that cannot be used is called entropy, and once you do release the air from the green balloon, and the pressures are equalized, we say that you have generated entropy.
How does this relate to your question? Well, in order to be able to have the propeller to work, you would have to pump all the air out of the red balloon back into the green one (or viceversa) and reintroduce the state of disequilibrium. But to do that, you would need a pump that will also generate entropy. And when you release the air for the second time you will generate more equilibrium, so on and so forth until you run out of energy to operate the pump.
So the important observation here is that entropy only flows one way. You can only generate it. The only way to destroy entropy is to generate more of it somewhere else, such that the net change is still on the side of generating it, rather than destroying it.
So a way to know that time is progressing forward and not backwards, is the observation that entropy is constantly increasing.
A perpetual motion machine, for example, would be one where the propeller that is spinning inside the tube, spins the pump that fills one of the balloons back up. In this case, entropy is not reversed per se, but it is stopped, which is also impossible. In order to be able to make this perpetual motion machine work, you would have to find a way to generate no entropy, and if you want the perpetual motion machine to do work in addition to re-pumping the balloons, you would have to find a way to reverse entropy. If entropy is flowing in the reverse direction (from more entropy to less entropy) then time must also be flowing backwards. This is the single, most absolutely obstacle to time traveling into the past. You would have to make entropy flow in the reverse direction that it does in order for time to also be reversed.How does a perpetual motion machine reverse entropy or time?You are asking how something which you know cannot exist would do something which you know is impossible.
If you are expecting practical schematics, you are going to be disappointed.kbb used car value travel trailers
You simply cannot continue to extract useful work from something that requires no additional energy input. Energy is a commodity like water or copper or oxygen or anything else. All so-called perpetual motion machines will run down and stop. You can't make a bottle that gives an unlimited supply of water; you can't make an oil well that gives an unlimited supply of gasoline, and you can't make a car that goes forever without adding any additional fuel to the gas tank. It is stupid to think that you can. Even the Sun will burn out some day.How does a perpetual motion machine reverse entropy or time?
Because perpetual motion is a system with infinite motion which is impossible. Those desktop "perpetual motion" displays operate by the transference of motion so they do not violate entropy, but something with infinite motion would never gain disorder of the system which is what entropy is and would in turn violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics, it doesn't happen. They wouldn't reverse time, but the there would be no entropy which is impossible because any time you move something you disturb the system and outside systems as well, increasing entropy. You can't reverse entropy because that would imply reversing time which violates causality. So, the fact that entropy can't be reversed fundamentally boils down to causality.How does a perpetual motion machine reverse entropy or time?Because In theory entropy can only increase in an open system over time.
You can think of "potential energy" also as "potential entropy". Using state functions (you don;t wanna get in to it) you can determine the amount of entropy created by changing a given state (ball on top of a hill) to another state (a ball on the bottom of a hill). The ball at the bottom of the hill will have a higher thermodynamic entropy. (if you wanna get in to here ya go: http://pcp.lanl.gov/ENTRTHER.html )
Anything that can reduce entropy in an open system is... well is NOT.. period. So creating a lower entropy state (adding energy to system) without its corresponding+ increase in entropy someplace else.. is a no go.
You can push the ball back up the hill.. But you need to turn calories in to kinetic motion and heat to do it. Perpetual motion "teleports" that ball back to the top of the hill without using additional energy-entropy.How does a perpetual motion machine reverse entropy or time?
Entropy is a very hard concept to grasp for a lot of people. It is sometimes explained as a measure of disorder in a system. That's a pretty good explanation for most applications, but for thermodynamics, it is insufficient. Entropy is a measure of how much of the energy in a given system is not available to do work.
Let's say you have two balloons, one green that's blown up, and the other red that's not blown up, and the two are joined at the nozzles with a tube. Now keep in mind that we could put a small propeller inside the tube so that when air flows from the filled balloon to the empty one, the propeller spins and does work.
Now, before you release the air in the green balloon, the mass of air that's inside the balloon has an internal energy U. Some of this energy can be used to spin the propeller, and some cannot.
Let's imagine that you release the air in the green balloon, and as the air spins the propeller, the propeller does some amount of work. The important thing to recognize is that you cannot empty out ALL of the air from the green balloon to the red balloon. The air pressures will equalize and that's when the air will stop moving through the tube, and the propeller will stop doing work. The system has gone from a state where there was no equilibrium, to a state where it is balanced, but no further.
In other words, you cannot use all of the internal energy U, to spin that propeller. Only some of the energy can be used. The energy that cannot be used is called entropy, and once you do release the air from the green balloon, and the pressures are equalized, we say that you have generated entropy.
How does this relate to your question? Well, in order to be able to have the propeller to work, you would have to pump all the air out of the red balloon back into the green one (or viceversa) and reintroduce the state of disequilibrium. But to do that, you would need a pump that will also generate entropy. And when you release the air for the second time you will generate more equilibrium, so on and so forth until you run out of energy to operate the pump.
So the important observation here is that entropy only flows one way. You can only generate it. The only way to destroy entropy is to generate more of it somewhere else, such that the net change is still on the side of generating it, rather than destroying it.
So a way to know that time is progressing forward and not backwards, is the observation that entropy is constantly increasing.
A perpetual motion machine, for example, would be one where the propeller that is spinning inside the tube, spins the pump that fills one of the balloons back up. In this case, entropy is not reversed per se, but it is stopped, which is also impossible. In order to be able to make this perpetual motion machine work, you would have to find a way to generate no entropy, and if you want the perpetual motion machine to do work in addition to re-pumping the balloons, you would have to find a way to reverse entropy. If entropy is flowing in the reverse direction (from more entropy to less entropy) then time must also be flowing backwards. This is the single, most absolutely obstacle to time traveling into the past. You would have to make entropy flow in the reverse direction that it does in order for time to also be reversed.How does a perpetual motion machine reverse entropy or time?You are asking how something which you know cannot exist would do something which you know is impossible.
If you are expecting practical schematics, you are going to be disappointed.
How to make slow motion in pinnacle studio 14?
When I want to make a slow motion clip, it just shows me a question mark, I hear the sound, but no video, Just a question mark.How to make slow motion in pinnacle studio 14?Sometimes, it gets stuck. But you just produce it and see. There are some chances to work.
What and why is she having a motion hearing for?
My sister got charged with two offenses. She was found guilty due to a no contest plea. She recently recevied a letter from the court for a motion hearing. What is this motion hearing for?What and why is she having a motion hearing for?It could be for anything. A "motion" is when one party requests the court to do something. So like the poster above me said, without more information, nobody can tell you what it is for. Do you know if her lawyer tried to set aside the plea? Or maybe requested some kind of lesser sentence like diversion? Who's requesting the hearing? The DA or her attorney? That makes a big difference on what it could possibly be for.What and why is she having a motion hearing for?No telling. She can go to the court and look at the file. A motion is a request to the court to issue some sort of order. There are many sorts of orders and thus many sorts of motions. It could be a motion to revoke probation for a violation, or it could be a motion to correct the judgment to give her credit for time served or it could be almost anything else.What and why is she having a motion hearing for?Sorry, I can't see the letter from here. Maybe if you hold it closer to the screen?
Nobody can answer your question without more information. Perhaps her attorney should see the letter?
Nobody can answer your question without more information. Perhaps her attorney should see the letter?
What can I reasonably expect to receive when I file a motion for discovery re: a traffic ticket?
I recently got a speeding ticket in the state of California for traveling at 72mph on a 70mph max freeway. Sad but true. Needless to say, I want to fight the ticket in court.
Question: What can I reasonably request (and reasonably expect to receive) when I file a motion for discovery with regard to my speeding ticket?What can I reasonably expect to receive when I file a motion for discovery re: a traffic ticket?You will receive any documentation/List of witnesses/police report/video that exists of the incident.
I am not sure if in California they turn on their dash cams automatically when the red lights go on or not. If they do, they may have video.
Reality is you will receive a pre-printed form and a copy of the citation that was issued.What can I reasonably expect to receive when I file a motion for discovery re: a traffic ticket?You can expect to get any video AND audio footage of the incident. (It usually comes in mini-DV format!).What can I reasonably expect to receive when I file a motion for discovery re: a traffic ticket?John Ziegler fan are we?What can I reasonably expect to receive when I file a motion for discovery re: a traffic ticket?
You can also reasonably request the service records of the radar machine that was used to "clock" you to determine the date of the last calibration, how long the machine has been in service; a copy of your speeding ticket; you may also want to inquire as to how many tickets this officer wrote on this day, etc.; the average amount of tickets the officer writes per month; how many were for speeding? What was the average speed for each ticket written? You may get an objection in form of "this request is overly broad, burdensome and not reasonably calculated to lead to discoverable evidence" with regard to the average speed question. You are entitled to know what they have.
Question: What can I reasonably request (and reasonably expect to receive) when I file a motion for discovery with regard to my speeding ticket?What can I reasonably expect to receive when I file a motion for discovery re: a traffic ticket?You will receive any documentation/List of witnesses/police report/video that exists of the incident.
I am not sure if in California they turn on their dash cams automatically when the red lights go on or not. If they do, they may have video.
Reality is you will receive a pre-printed form and a copy of the citation that was issued.What can I reasonably expect to receive when I file a motion for discovery re: a traffic ticket?You can expect to get any video AND audio footage of the incident. (It usually comes in mini-DV format!).What can I reasonably expect to receive when I file a motion for discovery re: a traffic ticket?John Ziegler fan are we?What can I reasonably expect to receive when I file a motion for discovery re: a traffic ticket?
You can also reasonably request the service records of the radar machine that was used to "clock" you to determine the date of the last calibration, how long the machine has been in service; a copy of your speeding ticket; you may also want to inquire as to how many tickets this officer wrote on this day, etc.; the average amount of tickets the officer writes per month; how many were for speeding? What was the average speed for each ticket written? You may get an objection in form of "this request is overly broad, burdensome and not reasonably calculated to lead to discoverable evidence" with regard to the average speed question. You are entitled to know what they have.
How many revolutions does the tub turn while it is in motion?
the tub of a washer goes into its spin cycle, starting from rest and gaining angular speed steadily for 9 sec, at which time it is turning at 5 rev/s. at this point, a person opens the lid and the safety turns off the washer. the tub smoothly slows to rest in 14 secs. through how many revolutions does the tub turn while it is in motion?How many revolutions does the tub turn while it is in motion?Speeding up from 0 to 5 revs / sec in 9 seconds
The average number of revs / second is 2.5
2.5 * 9 = 20.5
Slowing down
2.5 * 14 = 35
Total is 20.5 + 35How many revolutions does the tub turn while it is in motion?57.5 revs
The average number of revs / second is 2.5
2.5 * 9 = 20.5
Slowing down
2.5 * 14 = 35
Total is 20.5 + 35How many revolutions does the tub turn while it is in motion?57.5 revs
What games on Nintendo Wii need the motion plus controller?
Which games on Nintendo Wii need the motion plus controller, and can't you play those games with a normal wiimote?. Also, I will be playing Ea Sprots Active, Wii Fit Plus, Wii Sports, Wii Sports Resort and Just Dance 2 so will I need a Motion Pluscontroller for these games?
Thanks in advance.What games on Nintendo Wii need the motion plus controller?The only (current) games that actually REQUIRE the use of Wii Motion Plus right now are:
1. Red Steel 2
2. FlingSmash
3. Wii Sports Resort
The Legend of Zelda: Skyward Sword WILL require the use of Wii Motion Plus, but that game is not out yet. Also, Wii Play: Motion (the sequel to Wii Play) will require it, but that doesn't come out until June 13th.
There are other games that can USE the Wii Motion Plus, but don't REQUIRE it. You can click on this link for a list of those:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_gam鈥?/a>
So... the only game that YOU HAVE that you need a MotionPlus controller (or Wii Remote Plus) is the "Wii Sports Resort" game. All the other games that you mentioned, you don't need Motion Plus for.
You CAN'T play Wii Sports Resort with a normal Wiimote, you need the Wii Remote Plus.What games on Nintendo Wii need the motion plus controller?here's the full list:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wi鈥?/a>sea ray eragon book 4 release date
Thanks in advance.What games on Nintendo Wii need the motion plus controller?The only (current) games that actually REQUIRE the use of Wii Motion Plus right now are:
1. Red Steel 2
2. FlingSmash
3. Wii Sports Resort
The Legend of Zelda: Skyward Sword WILL require the use of Wii Motion Plus, but that game is not out yet. Also, Wii Play: Motion (the sequel to Wii Play) will require it, but that doesn't come out until June 13th.
There are other games that can USE the Wii Motion Plus, but don't REQUIRE it. You can click on this link for a list of those:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_gam鈥?/a>
So... the only game that YOU HAVE that you need a MotionPlus controller (or Wii Remote Plus) is the "Wii Sports Resort" game. All the other games that you mentioned, you don't need Motion Plus for.
You CAN'T play Wii Sports Resort with a normal Wiimote, you need the Wii Remote Plus.What games on Nintendo Wii need the motion plus controller?here's the full list:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wi鈥?/a>
Does the simple harmonic motion formula represent everything in life?
Economics, weather, civilizations? I've heard people say that life is like a pendulum, full of ups and downs. In that case the formula does represent everything, right? Or maybe it's dampened harmonic motion that represents everything.Does the simple harmonic motion formula represent everything in life?No. Radioactive decay for example is an exponential function and clearly not harmonic.Does the simple harmonic motion formula represent everything in life?...What?
Report Abuse
What produces the retrograde motion of Mars?
What produces the retrograde motion of mars? is it that Earth is faster than Mars?What produces the retrograde motion of Mars?The retrograde motion of any planet superior to Earth, that is, anything farther from the sun than Earth in our solar system, appears to retrograde due to the Earth "catching up" to the planet. This happens when the Earth approaches, is at, and passes the periapsis (closes distance) with another planet.What produces the retrograde motion of Mars?
The Lazy Astronomer and Dr. Know-It-All both gave excellent answers but gathered nothing but thumb downs. Looks like a JUVENILE PACK OF SLEAZY TROLLS have suddenly infested the Astronomy section.
Here's another correct answer for the kiddies to dump on --
The *apparent* retrograde motion of Mars and other planets is caused by its being lapped by another planet, or vice-versa. Both planets move in a direct (eastward) motion around the Sun, but the planet with the inside orbit, like Earth, moves faster than the planet on the outside orbit, like Mars, and when it passes the slower-moving planet, each sees the other one as apparently moving backwards relative to its usual motion around the sky. In this "retrograde" motion, neither planet is actually moving backwards; it only appears that way, during the time that one laps the other.What produces the retrograde motion of Mars?1. order of planets (from sun) mercury venus earth mars jupiter etc.
2. earth is closer than mars ----%26gt; has a smaller orbit distance
3. faster orbit
4. laps mars -----%26gt; mars APPEARS to move backwards across the sky
hope this helps (:What produces the retrograde motion of Mars?
Yes, the difference in orbital speed between earth and the other planets produces retograde motion - as well as the relative position on their respective orbits.What produces the retrograde motion of Mars?They both orbit the sun..and orbit at different speeds.
The Lazy Astronomer and Dr. Know-It-All both gave excellent answers but gathered nothing but thumb downs. Looks like a JUVENILE PACK OF SLEAZY TROLLS have suddenly infested the Astronomy section.
Here's another correct answer for the kiddies to dump on --
The *apparent* retrograde motion of Mars and other planets is caused by its being lapped by another planet, or vice-versa. Both planets move in a direct (eastward) motion around the Sun, but the planet with the inside orbit, like Earth, moves faster than the planet on the outside orbit, like Mars, and when it passes the slower-moving planet, each sees the other one as apparently moving backwards relative to its usual motion around the sky. In this "retrograde" motion, neither planet is actually moving backwards; it only appears that way, during the time that one laps the other.What produces the retrograde motion of Mars?1. order of planets (from sun) mercury venus earth mars jupiter etc.
2. earth is closer than mars ----%26gt; has a smaller orbit distance
3. faster orbit
4. laps mars -----%26gt; mars APPEARS to move backwards across the sky
hope this helps (:What produces the retrograde motion of Mars?
Yes, the difference in orbital speed between earth and the other planets produces retograde motion - as well as the relative position on their respective orbits.What produces the retrograde motion of Mars?They both orbit the sun..and orbit at different speeds.
How long will a motion to reopen take?
Our attorney filed a motion to reopen to immigration court and we are waiting for a response how long will it take?How long will a motion to reopen take?why would you pay an attorney and not ask him this question? I assume that's why you hired him in the first place.How long will a motion to reopen take?ask your attorney
How does your motion compare to the motion of a flying bird?
. Imagine a crow is flying due south and you are running on the ground chasing it. How will your motion compare to the crow鈥檚 motion?How does your motion compare to the motion of a flying bird?Probably a lot slower, unless I shoot the bird first.
If the bird is still living and flying, and I start out underneath, then I just run along, falling further and further behind because they are fast.
If the bird is still living and flying, and I start out NOT underneath, then my path will look something like an asymptote, as my running takes me closer and closer to underneath the bird's path.
If the bird is still living and flying, and I start out underneath, then I just run along, falling further and further behind because they are fast.
If the bird is still living and flying, and I start out NOT underneath, then my path will look something like an asymptote, as my running takes me closer and closer to underneath the bird's path.
What is the best motion picture version of Jane Eyre?
I've noticed that there are several motion picture versions of the book Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte. I want to know what is the best one. Now, When I said best, I meant the one which is closest to the dialogs and the scenes of the book. I'm studying this book for literature and I thought watching the film is the best way of remembering the quotations. Some help please!What is the best motion picture version of Jane Eyre?I really like the one that was made recently, the one with Toby Stephens.
http://www.amazon.com/Jane-Eyre-Masterpi鈥?/a>What is the best motion picture version of Jane Eyre?I liked the one with Charlotte Gainsbourg and William Hurt from 1996.. .It's really good! ...One of my favorite movies!
http://www.amazon.com/Jane-Eyre-Anna-Paq鈥?/a>What is the best motion picture version of Jane Eyre?Masterpiece Theatre's Jane Eyre is supposed to be really good. I've seen bits and pieces of it (maybe an hour as a whole) and it seems to be pretty reliant on the book. Masterpiece Theatre has usually done a good job in portraying books and plays too. It comes on PBS often enough, so you may not even have to rent it; though it is in 2 parts.bully dog infiniti g37
http://www.amazon.com/Jane-Eyre-Masterpi鈥?/a>What is the best motion picture version of Jane Eyre?I liked the one with Charlotte Gainsbourg and William Hurt from 1996.. .It's really good! ...One of my favorite movies!
http://www.amazon.com/Jane-Eyre-Anna-Paq鈥?/a>What is the best motion picture version of Jane Eyre?Masterpiece Theatre's Jane Eyre is supposed to be really good. I've seen bits and pieces of it (maybe an hour as a whole) and it seems to be pretty reliant on the book. Masterpiece Theatre has usually done a good job in portraying books and plays too. It comes on PBS often enough, so you may not even have to rent it; though it is in 2 parts.
What are those video loop things of like a city and cars driving and everything in fast motion?
What are those video loop things of like a city and cars driving and everything in fast motion? Some people have them on their myspaces. If anybody knows what they are called and/or a website i can find them that would be greatly appreciated. What are those video loop things of like a city and cars driving and everything in fast motion?Don't be silly. Ask them :)
How would I make a stop motion film in adobe premier?
I have about 200 photos that I need to make into a stop motion film. I could use luciole on ubuntu but I have to use premier at school so I can get used to using premier (school tv news channel class)
so how would I do it? I know that I must import the photos, but the last time I tried to make them into a stop motion film, it had huge black parts, so what do I do after importing the photos?How would I make a stop motion film in adobe premier?in adobe Premier you'd have to load each photo in as a frame, then change the frame rate. I would advise using adobe Flash instead. You can load each picture into a frame and change the frame rate really easily, then export it as an .mov.
so how would I do it? I know that I must import the photos, but the last time I tried to make them into a stop motion film, it had huge black parts, so what do I do after importing the photos?How would I make a stop motion film in adobe premier?in adobe Premier you'd have to load each photo in as a frame, then change the frame rate. I would advise using adobe Flash instead. You can load each picture into a frame and change the frame rate really easily, then export it as an .mov.
What actually happens in a space shuttle performing a circular motion?
Is it accelerating anyways...I guess it accelerates radially but not linearly or tangentially (I hope they both mean the same).
And what happens to the gravity? How does it disappear ??
Will the affect of gravity be still zero when its performing circular motion at a distance just above the surface of the earth (like at a height of 100m)
(I know its impossible but lets just say so AFTER ALL ITS PHYSICS!! ;) and thanks for answering!! )What actually happens in a space shuttle performing a circular motion?If by 'circular motion' you mean being in orbit, then the gravity is still there, but is balanced by the centrifuge force (the centrifuge force is an illusory one, but from the point of view of the shuttle, it is what is perceived). Seen from the actual official physics point of view, an object in orbit is simply free falling, but with the forward motion it has, it keeps missing the ground. When free falling, the gravity seems to vanish, but that is simply because it is not balanced by anything. If it makes it better for you to intuitively understand, one could claim that we do not feel gravity, ever. What we feel is the reaction that the ground exerts on our feet which balanced the weight. Remove the ground, and the feeling of weight goes away. Of course, to do that, you have to fall.
The altitude has nothing to do with it, the shuttle could be in orbit at 100 m altitude if it was not for the atmosphere dragging it down.
Edit: falan-filan answer below could be misleading. The Shuttle is nowhere near an altitude where the acceleration due to gravity is substantially reduced. The Earth radius is approximately 6370 km. The ISS (and thus the Shuttle when it goes there) orbits about 350 km about.
(6370 / (6370+350) )^2 = 0.9479
So, the acceleration due to gravity is almost 95% of the one we experience at sea level at the altitude the space station orbits. Rockets use their trust only to gain the altitude required to get out of the atmospheres, so that they can gain the orbital speed (tangential) without the drag of the air.
When leaving orbit, rockets do not use thrust to fight against gravity, they use it to accelerate further just going to a higher orbit, until the speed exceed escape velocity. That is why interplanetary probes trajectory are not straight lines, but always very elongated orbits.What actually happens in a space shuttle performing a circular motion?
No. 1. Gravity drag %26gt; Resistance drag until you reach a certain altitude. The higher you get the less is gravity drag. (Esc. velocity) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G鈥?/a>
2. Once you reach escape velocity, there is yet another you need to reach to leave an orbit(esc. vel 2)
4. the comparability of different gravitational pulls on you completely have to do with your distance to each, and their masses. The effect of G(substantial or not) on you depends where you are in outer space wrt the two masses. It drops exponentially by 2nd order. Period.
6. otherwise your rocket would have to fly at enormous speeds in order to fly parallel to the earth's surface at 2000m altitude, like a plane, and not fall. (little cross sectional area no aerodynamics, no air buoyancy increaser-buoyancy is not drag). such a rocket has nothing to do with the topic.
7. compared to 5. so after the trust and escape from the atmosphere, with the drag eliminated in vacuum, g field is what prevails(no thrust) and it is very important that some celestial object attracts you more as you approach it and another pulls you with a decreasing force (all due to distance).
if it is moving at a constant speed in this circular orbit(if it is not orbiting around something but just rotating like a car on a circular track), then yes the only thing that changes is the direction of motion so there is only radial acceleration f = ma = mw^2r = (mv^2)/r where w is the angular velocity in radians and r is radius so the linear velocity v = wr and a = (v^2)/r
linear velocity is just a term used to tell v from w, in that, a rotating round object, for instance the Earth has equal w along its longitudes (sweeps a constant angle at a certain period of time along horizontal lines at equal latitude) but as one approaches from the center of the Earth to its surface the arc length swept by this angle increases so you have to travel a greater distance 100m above the Earth(imagine a spherical surface whose radius is increased by 100m) to sweep the same angle in comparison to the length you'd have to travel on the surface of the Earth.
the tangential acceleration is the component of the resultant acceleration that is perpendicular to the radial one. tangential acceleration implies a change in the amount(magnitude) of velocity, whereas radial acc. implies a change in the direction of velocity.
so a car speeding up on a circular track has constant radial acceleration in magnitude but its speed is increasing so tangential velocity is increasing too.
gravity does not disappear, it's just reduced to negligible amounts: G = g*M1*m2/r^2
where G is the gravitational force, M1 and M2 masses of 2 objects that exert this gravitational force on one another(same in amount opposite in direction, you pull the earth towards you just as much as your weight meaning, the Earth pulls you towards itself with a force as much as your weight but by convention, the effect of the Earth on you is called gravity as its mass is much larger therefore contributing a lot more to G, so gravitational acceleration is always downward, towards the center of the Earth), and r is the distance between them.
so G decreases by the square of the distance between these objects. so gravity does not disappear. in fact that's why rockets' propulsion force is important for a rocket to be able to overcome gravity until it travels a distance where G is substantially reduced.
when it approaches another celestial object, then it enters the gravitational field of that object and if its tangential velocity cannot overcome the v in f = (mv^2)/r it will either rotate in that orbit or fall back to the surface of the planetary object.
so when this v equals the one in the formula so that it's just enough to escape, it's called escape velocity.
And what happens to the gravity? How does it disappear ??
Will the affect of gravity be still zero when its performing circular motion at a distance just above the surface of the earth (like at a height of 100m)
(I know its impossible but lets just say so AFTER ALL ITS PHYSICS!! ;) and thanks for answering!! )What actually happens in a space shuttle performing a circular motion?If by 'circular motion' you mean being in orbit, then the gravity is still there, but is balanced by the centrifuge force (the centrifuge force is an illusory one, but from the point of view of the shuttle, it is what is perceived). Seen from the actual official physics point of view, an object in orbit is simply free falling, but with the forward motion it has, it keeps missing the ground. When free falling, the gravity seems to vanish, but that is simply because it is not balanced by anything. If it makes it better for you to intuitively understand, one could claim that we do not feel gravity, ever. What we feel is the reaction that the ground exerts on our feet which balanced the weight. Remove the ground, and the feeling of weight goes away. Of course, to do that, you have to fall.
The altitude has nothing to do with it, the shuttle could be in orbit at 100 m altitude if it was not for the atmosphere dragging it down.
Edit: falan-filan answer below could be misleading. The Shuttle is nowhere near an altitude where the acceleration due to gravity is substantially reduced. The Earth radius is approximately 6370 km. The ISS (and thus the Shuttle when it goes there) orbits about 350 km about.
(6370 / (6370+350) )^2 = 0.9479
So, the acceleration due to gravity is almost 95% of the one we experience at sea level at the altitude the space station orbits. Rockets use their trust only to gain the altitude required to get out of the atmospheres, so that they can gain the orbital speed (tangential) without the drag of the air.
When leaving orbit, rockets do not use thrust to fight against gravity, they use it to accelerate further just going to a higher orbit, until the speed exceed escape velocity. That is why interplanetary probes trajectory are not straight lines, but always very elongated orbits.What actually happens in a space shuttle performing a circular motion?
No. 1. Gravity drag %26gt; Resistance drag until you reach a certain altitude. The higher you get the less is gravity drag. (Esc. velocity) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G鈥?/a>
2. Once you reach escape velocity, there is yet another you need to reach to leave an orbit(esc. vel 2)
Report Abuse
What actually happens in a space shuttle performing a circular motion?3. He asked multiple questions and while d2 = d1 + 100 m is not a great difference wrt earth's radius, any dummy d for positions in the outer space could as well be. we send shuttles to Mars. actually, in space no air drag, therefore entering from one g field to another is the whole case.Report Abuse
4. the comparability of different gravitational pulls on you completely have to do with your distance to each, and their masses. The effect of G(substantial or not) on you depends where you are in outer space wrt the two masses. It drops exponentially by 2nd order. Period.
Report Abuse
What actually happens in a space shuttle performing a circular motion?5. while thrusting you are moving up so the major thing you have to overcome is your weight(gravitational pull) + air drag where gravity has the greater effect but it is when you get rid of the drag that you can assume a position to fly tangentially to the orbit. (no wings like a plane)Report Abuse
What actually happens in a space shuttle performing a circular motion?6. otherwise your rocket would have to fly at enormous speeds in order to fly parallel to the earth's surface at 2000m altitude, like a plane, and not fall. (little cross sectional area no aerodynamics, no air buoyancy increaser-buoyancy is not drag). such a rocket has nothing to do with the topic.
Report Abuse
7. compared to 5. so after the trust and escape from the atmosphere, with the drag eliminated in vacuum, g field is what prevails(no thrust) and it is very important that some celestial object attracts you more as you approach it and another pulls you with a decreasing force (all due to distance).
Report Abuse
What actually happens in a space shuttle performing a circular motion?if it is moving at a constant speed in this circular orbit(if it is not orbiting around something but just rotating like a car on a circular track), then yes the only thing that changes is the direction of motion so there is only radial acceleration f = ma = mw^2r = (mv^2)/r where w is the angular velocity in radians and r is radius so the linear velocity v = wr and a = (v^2)/r
linear velocity is just a term used to tell v from w, in that, a rotating round object, for instance the Earth has equal w along its longitudes (sweeps a constant angle at a certain period of time along horizontal lines at equal latitude) but as one approaches from the center of the Earth to its surface the arc length swept by this angle increases so you have to travel a greater distance 100m above the Earth(imagine a spherical surface whose radius is increased by 100m) to sweep the same angle in comparison to the length you'd have to travel on the surface of the Earth.
the tangential acceleration is the component of the resultant acceleration that is perpendicular to the radial one. tangential acceleration implies a change in the amount(magnitude) of velocity, whereas radial acc. implies a change in the direction of velocity.
so a car speeding up on a circular track has constant radial acceleration in magnitude but its speed is increasing so tangential velocity is increasing too.
gravity does not disappear, it's just reduced to negligible amounts: G = g*M1*m2/r^2
where G is the gravitational force, M1 and M2 masses of 2 objects that exert this gravitational force on one another(same in amount opposite in direction, you pull the earth towards you just as much as your weight meaning, the Earth pulls you towards itself with a force as much as your weight but by convention, the effect of the Earth on you is called gravity as its mass is much larger therefore contributing a lot more to G, so gravitational acceleration is always downward, towards the center of the Earth), and r is the distance between them.
so G decreases by the square of the distance between these objects. so gravity does not disappear. in fact that's why rockets' propulsion force is important for a rocket to be able to overcome gravity until it travels a distance where G is substantially reduced.
when it approaches another celestial object, then it enters the gravitational field of that object and if its tangential velocity cannot overcome the v in f = (mv^2)/r it will either rotate in that orbit or fall back to the surface of the planetary object.
so when this v equals the one in the formula so that it's just enough to escape, it's called escape velocity.
What type of data must scientists collect to determine the motion or predict the path of a body in space?
What type of data must scientists collect to determine the motion or predict the path of a body in space?What type of data must scientists collect to determine the motion or predict the path of a body in space?This should help.
http://universe.nasa.gov/au/contact.html
http://universe.nasa.gov/au/contact.html
What's the average force a cars tires exert against the track to maintain its circular motion in this problem?
A 1200kg car rounds a circular track of a radius of 45 meters in 9 seconds."What is the average force that the car's tires exerts against the track to maintain its circular motion?"
PLEASE show all work/show how to do everything in order to complete the problem.
THANKYOUU.What's the average force a cars tires exert against the track to maintain its circular motion in this problem?Let's start by getting the car's velocity:
Circumference = 2*pi*r = 2*pi*45m = 282.74m
velocity = Circumference/time = 282.74m/9s = 31.416 m/s
The centripetal force can then be calculated as:
Fc = mv^2/r = (1200kg)(31.416 m/s)^2 / 45m = 26318.9 kgm/s^2 = 26318.9 N
This centripetal force is provided by the friction between the tires and the track. The track is exerting this force on the car towards the center of the circle while the car is exerting this force on the track in the opposite direction. 26318.9 N is probably the answer that you want.
However, keep in mind that the car is also exerting a force downward on the track that is equal to the gravitational force on the car (i.e. (1200kg)(9.8 m/s^2) = 11760 N). So, the car is exerting a frictional force on the track of 26318.9 N in the outward radial direction and 11760 N in the downward direction. The magnitude of the net force that the car is exerting on the track is calculated as follows:
Fnet = Sqrt[26318.9^2 + 11760^2] = 28826.8 N
Depending on how detailed your class discussions have been, either one could be the answer that you want.gas mileage calculator miata
PLEASE show all work/show how to do everything in order to complete the problem.
THANKYOUU.What's the average force a cars tires exert against the track to maintain its circular motion in this problem?Let's start by getting the car's velocity:
Circumference = 2*pi*r = 2*pi*45m = 282.74m
velocity = Circumference/time = 282.74m/9s = 31.416 m/s
The centripetal force can then be calculated as:
Fc = mv^2/r = (1200kg)(31.416 m/s)^2 / 45m = 26318.9 kgm/s^2 = 26318.9 N
This centripetal force is provided by the friction between the tires and the track. The track is exerting this force on the car towards the center of the circle while the car is exerting this force on the track in the opposite direction. 26318.9 N is probably the answer that you want.
However, keep in mind that the car is also exerting a force downward on the track that is equal to the gravitational force on the car (i.e. (1200kg)(9.8 m/s^2) = 11760 N). So, the car is exerting a frictional force on the track of 26318.9 N in the outward radial direction and 11760 N in the downward direction. The magnitude of the net force that the car is exerting on the track is calculated as follows:
Fnet = Sqrt[26318.9^2 + 11760^2] = 28826.8 N
Depending on how detailed your class discussions have been, either one could be the answer that you want.
Thursday, January 26, 2012
How long will a typical battery last in a typical motion sensor?
If you have a motion sensor and have experienced this or found information about this question, please answer.How long will a typical battery last in a typical motion sensor?The two typical types of motion senors I'm acquainted with are either powered by photo cells for exterior or 110 for interior.How long will a typical battery last in a typical motion sensor?I am unable to answer your question because I don't know the power drain of your motion detector. May I suggest you contact the manufacturer with the model number and they can tell you. I have 3 motion detectors but they are all wired into the house current.How long will a typical battery last in a typical motion sensor?does it detect allot of motion.How long will a typical battery last in a typical motion sensor?
until they burn out then replace them
until they burn out then replace them
How do I take pictures in low light without getting motion blur?
I'm using a Nikon D3100. I like taking pictures when I am at parties and what not and I never use flash. I realize that I have to set the exposure value to like 1/4 or 1/16 even to take pictures in low light. But I notice that when the exposure is this low and people are moving I get motion blur. How do I take pictures in low light conditions?How do I take pictures in low light without getting motion blur?Uh, 1/4 or 1/16 is not the exposure value but the shutterspeed.
Anyway, if the lens or camera has VR, use it. It will allow you to sue slightly slower speeds while handholding the camera.
The other things is as fhotoace said, raise your ISO as far as you can. Noise isn't nice but it's atleast to some extent possible to reduce the noise in post processing, blur can't be fixed.
If flash is possible (i.e allowed and you can afford a reasonable flash), then get a flash. It's undoubtably different than a photograph without flash but if used correctly you can light your subject and freeze their motion (i.e no motion blur) without completely overpowering all the ambient light. Ofcourse you'll then have to learn how to use the flash so...
If you really feel that flash won't work for you or in the situations that you photograph (for instance if you're trying to photograph sports or concerts flash is often impossible) other than raising ISO, and using the smallest available aperture there's not really much more you can do.How do I take pictures in low light without getting motion blur?I agree with the other two...monopod, higher ISO....AND a faster lens (the lower the f/stop number, the "faster it is). When I am shooting low light situations without a flash, the slowest lens I use is a f/2.8 (but I prefer the f/1.4 and f/1.8's).How do I take pictures in low light without getting motion blur?Increase the ISO setting to at least 3200.
It is far easier to reduce the noise later using Lightroom or Noise Ninja than dealing with the blur caused by slow shutter speeds.
Sample photo shot at night at 3200 ISO
http://s862.photobucket.com/albums/ab182鈥?/a>How do I take pictures in low light without getting motion blur?
One word, monopod. Why do I say that instead of tripod? Imagine being at a party and needing to constantly move a tripod around.
Anyway, if the lens or camera has VR, use it. It will allow you to sue slightly slower speeds while handholding the camera.
The other things is as fhotoace said, raise your ISO as far as you can. Noise isn't nice but it's atleast to some extent possible to reduce the noise in post processing, blur can't be fixed.
If flash is possible (i.e allowed and you can afford a reasonable flash), then get a flash. It's undoubtably different than a photograph without flash but if used correctly you can light your subject and freeze their motion (i.e no motion blur) without completely overpowering all the ambient light. Ofcourse you'll then have to learn how to use the flash so...
If you really feel that flash won't work for you or in the situations that you photograph (for instance if you're trying to photograph sports or concerts flash is often impossible) other than raising ISO, and using the smallest available aperture there's not really much more you can do.How do I take pictures in low light without getting motion blur?I agree with the other two...monopod, higher ISO....AND a faster lens (the lower the f/stop number, the "faster it is). When I am shooting low light situations without a flash, the slowest lens I use is a f/2.8 (but I prefer the f/1.4 and f/1.8's).How do I take pictures in low light without getting motion blur?Increase the ISO setting to at least 3200.
It is far easier to reduce the noise later using Lightroom or Noise Ninja than dealing with the blur caused by slow shutter speeds.
Sample photo shot at night at 3200 ISO
http://s862.photobucket.com/albums/ab182鈥?/a>How do I take pictures in low light without getting motion blur?
One word, monopod. Why do I say that instead of tripod? Imagine being at a party and needing to constantly move a tripod around.
How does vibration/motion of a star help when determining which star is closer and farther ?
For example, thats related to stellar seismology.
So if i want to identify which start is closer from 2 stars, how would motion/vibration be important?
and if i wanted to make a diagram describing why , what would i put ?
thanksyou :)How does vibration/motion of a star help when determining which star is closer and farther ?If one star moves farther in a time period than another (let's say they move at the same speed), most likely that star is closer. Not exactly sure about vibration.
So if i want to identify which start is closer from 2 stars, how would motion/vibration be important?
and if i wanted to make a diagram describing why , what would i put ?
thanksyou :)How does vibration/motion of a star help when determining which star is closer and farther ?If one star moves farther in a time period than another (let's say they move at the same speed), most likely that star is closer. Not exactly sure about vibration.
How to find the amplitude of an object that is in simple harmonic motion?
An object executing simple harmonic motion has a maximum speed of 4.3 m/s and a maximum acceleration of 0.65 m/s^2. Find (a) the amplitude and (b) the period of this motion.How to find the amplitude of an object that is in simple harmonic motion?General "rule of thumb" between the maxima of kinematics quantities of SHM:
vmax = omega*xmax
amax = omega*vmax
To take a maximum of a time derivative...multiply by omega.
To take a maximum of a time integral...divide by omega.
Given that, solve for omega:
omega = amax/vmax
And, thus:
xmax = vmax/omega
xmax= vmax/(amax/vmax)
xmax = vmax^2/amax
Convert omega to a period:
T = 2*Pi/omega
T = 2*Pi*vmax/amax
Summary:
xmax = vmax^2/amax
T = 2*Pi*vmax/amax
Data:
vmax := 4.3 m/s
amax := 0.65 m/s^2
Result:
xmax = 28.4 meters
T = 41.6 seconds
vmax = omega*xmax
amax = omega*vmax
To take a maximum of a time derivative...multiply by omega.
To take a maximum of a time integral...divide by omega.
Given that, solve for omega:
omega = amax/vmax
And, thus:
xmax = vmax/omega
xmax= vmax/(amax/vmax)
xmax = vmax^2/amax
Convert omega to a period:
T = 2*Pi/omega
T = 2*Pi*vmax/amax
Summary:
xmax = vmax^2/amax
T = 2*Pi*vmax/amax
Data:
vmax := 4.3 m/s
amax := 0.65 m/s^2
Result:
xmax = 28.4 meters
T = 41.6 seconds
How do I trick office light motion detectors?
Help. Everytime i leave my office for more than thirty minutes, the office lights go off due to no motion. Is there a low cost way I can trick them to still see motion so that the lights stay on?How do I trick office light motion detectors?How about a fan with streamers attached?textfree pinger carolina skiff
How did the ptolemaic model of the universe explain retrograde motion?
How did the ptolemaic model of the universe explain retrograde motion?How did the ptolemaic model of the universe explain retrograde motion?Straight from this link: http://www.lasalle.edu/~smithsc/Astronom…
The model of the solar system developed by Ptolemy (87 - 150 A.D.) was a refinement of Aristotle's (384 - 322 B.C.) universe. This model consisted of a series of concentric spheres, with the Earth at the center (geocentric). The motions of the Sun, Moon, and stars was based on perfect circles. To account for the observed retrograde motion of the planets, it was necessary to resort to a system of epicycles, whereby the planets moved around small circular paths that in turn moved around larger circular orbits around the Earth. This accounts for retrograde motion.
In its final form, the model was extremely complicated, requiring many nested levels of epicycles, and with even the major orbits offset so that they were no longer truly centered on the Earth. Despite all of this fine tuning, there remained significant discrepancies between the actual positions of the planets and those predicted by the model. Nevertheless, it was the most accurate model available, and it remained the accepted theory for over 13 centuries, before it was finally replaced by the model of Copernicus.
The model of the solar system developed by Ptolemy (87 - 150 A.D.) was a refinement of Aristotle's (384 - 322 B.C.) universe. This model consisted of a series of concentric spheres, with the Earth at the center (geocentric). The motions of the Sun, Moon, and stars was based on perfect circles. To account for the observed retrograde motion of the planets, it was necessary to resort to a system of epicycles, whereby the planets moved around small circular paths that in turn moved around larger circular orbits around the Earth. This accounts for retrograde motion.
In its final form, the model was extremely complicated, requiring many nested levels of epicycles, and with even the major orbits offset so that they were no longer truly centered on the Earth. Despite all of this fine tuning, there remained significant discrepancies between the actual positions of the planets and those predicted by the model. Nevertheless, it was the most accurate model available, and it remained the accepted theory for over 13 centuries, before it was finally replaced by the model of Copernicus.
What causes the brain to see things move in slow motion when in an auto accident?
When in an auto accident, you will see every thing move in slow motion, what causes this, and can it be activated at will?What causes the brain to see things move in slow motion when in an auto accident?The stress of the emergency situation causes a burst of adrenalin to be released, bringing about a heightened sensory state.
Supposedly anything your brain and body can do automatically or involuntarily can be done at will. It is a matter of proper training. I would have no idea how to go about gaining control of adrenalin secretion, however.
Supposedly anything your brain and body can do automatically or involuntarily can be done at will. It is a matter of proper training. I would have no idea how to go about gaining control of adrenalin secretion, however.
What kind of motion should you impart to the nozzle or a garden hose?
What kind of motion should you impart to the nozzle or a garden hose so that the resulting stream of water approximates a sine curve?What kind of motion should you impart to the nozzle or a garden hose?Keep at steady 45 degrees to ground. the water will follow half sine wave curve approx. (projectile movement)What kind of motion should you impart to the nozzle or a garden hose?Assuming you want an entire sine curve I would forget up and down motion since gravity is not your friend in this case. You would need to sweep the hose side to side, going the same distance past the mid point in each direction, at a constant speed. But this isn't a very good approximation either.
How would the motion equations look for a free fall of a body from 4000 km, no air friction ?
It is not a motion with a constant acceleration as the earth gravitation is changing inversely with the square of distance between two corps according with Newton's gravitation law.How would the motion equations look for a free fall of a body from 4000 km, no air friction ?If you begin with Newtons laws of motion and gravity, it would be very difficult for you to figure out how to integrate equations of motion. Beter write potential energy in form
PE = GMm/R and use conservation of energy.
Better yet use the following approach:
The falling body obeys the three laws of Kepler.
Write the laws and try to figure out how time depends on altitude t=t(h). No calculus required. It is easier to figure out what will happen if the body has small initial horizontal velocity, the body falling strictly vertically would be the limiting case.
Time dependence on altitude t(h) can be expressed in elemetary functions, but not altitude depedence on time h(t).How would the motion equations look for a free fall of a body from 4000 km, no air friction ?The key here is to remember that the effective mass of the Earth comes from its centre.
Position of body is R, and taking your coordinate system from the centre of the Earth:
R(body) = R(earth's surface) + h
e.g. at initial conditions with height h = 4000km:
R = 6400km + 4000km = 10400km
This is also the distance between their centres of mass, approximating that m(body) %26lt;%26lt; M(Earth)
Newton's second law: F = mR''
Newton's Law of gravitation F = -GMm/R^2 is the only force acting.
Acceleration will be
R'' = -GM/R^2
This is your equation of motion.
This is very difficult to solve for RHow would the motion equations look for a free fall of a body from 4000 km, no air friction ?F= -GMm/(r^2) where G is the Gravitational constant
M is the mass of earth
m is the mass of the body
r is the distance from the centre of earth
therefore
equation of motion is (taking upwards positive)
F=-GMm/(4000*100+d)^2 (if we change km to metre)
where d is the radius of the EarthHow would the motion equations look for a free fall of a body from 4000 km, no air friction ?
You are correct, the motion equations would be based on an acceleration that depended on the distance from the center of the Earth
a=G*me/(re+d)^2
where G is the gravitational constant
me is the mass of the Earth
re is the radius of the Earth
d is the distance above the surface of the earth
__________________-
PE = GMm/R and use conservation of energy.
Better yet use the following approach:
The falling body obeys the three laws of Kepler.
Write the laws and try to figure out how time depends on altitude t=t(h). No calculus required. It is easier to figure out what will happen if the body has small initial horizontal velocity, the body falling strictly vertically would be the limiting case.
Time dependence on altitude t(h) can be expressed in elemetary functions, but not altitude depedence on time h(t).How would the motion equations look for a free fall of a body from 4000 km, no air friction ?The key here is to remember that the effective mass of the Earth comes from its centre.
Position of body is R, and taking your coordinate system from the centre of the Earth:
R(body) = R(earth's surface) + h
e.g. at initial conditions with height h = 4000km:
R = 6400km + 4000km = 10400km
This is also the distance between their centres of mass, approximating that m(body) %26lt;%26lt; M(Earth)
Newton's second law: F = mR''
Newton's Law of gravitation F = -GMm/R^2 is the only force acting.
Acceleration will be
R'' = -GM/R^2
This is your equation of motion.
This is very difficult to solve for RHow would the motion equations look for a free fall of a body from 4000 km, no air friction ?F= -GMm/(r^2) where G is the Gravitational constant
M is the mass of earth
m is the mass of the body
r is the distance from the centre of earth
therefore
equation of motion is (taking upwards positive)
F=-GMm/(4000*100+d)^2 (if we change km to metre)
where d is the radius of the EarthHow would the motion equations look for a free fall of a body from 4000 km, no air friction ?
You are correct, the motion equations would be based on an acceleration that depended on the distance from the center of the Earth
a=G*me/(re+d)^2
where G is the gravitational constant
me is the mass of the Earth
re is the radius of the Earth
d is the distance above the surface of the earth
__________________-
What is the difference between a parabolic path and projectile motion.?
Like when throwing a football. Please read this.
When the football travels through the air, it always follows a curved, or parabolic, path because the movement of the ball in the vertical direction is influenced by the force of gravity. As the ball travels up, gravity slows it down until it stops briefly at its peak height; the ball then comes down, and gravity accelerates it until it hits the ground. This is the path of any object that is launched or thrown (football, arrow, ballistic missile) and is called projectile motion.What is the difference between a parabolic path and projectile motion.?Projectile motion is what it sounds like--the motion of a projectile.
If there are no forces on the projectile other than a constant weight (which is a reasonable approximation in many cases), then its path will be a parabola--its horizontal position will be be proportional to time, and its vertical position will be a quadratic function of time, and therefore of horizontal position.
An example of a projectile with a non-parabolic path would be a ballistic missile--once it burns out and clears the atmosphere, it follows an elliptical path until it re-enters.What is the difference between a parabolic path and projectile motion.?Projectile motion is an example of a parabolic path. It can be shown that the vertical position of the football as a function of the football's horizontal position is a quadratic.
In the horizontal direction, the football moves at constant velocity:
x = vcos胃 t
t = x / vcos胃
In the vertical direction, the football undergoes constant acceleration:
y = vsin胃 (t) - 陆g(t)虏
using the result above:
y = vsin胃 (x / vcos胃) - 陆g(x / vcos胃)虏
y = (tan胃) x - (g / 2(vcos胃)虏) x虏
Projectile motion is an example of a parabolic path.What is the difference between a parabolic path and projectile motion.?Parabola is a mathematical curve - an abstract concept. Projectile trajectory is a real curve - traced by a moving object.
Projectiles are said to follow parabolic path as a first approximation to their true motion. Real motions are influenced by air resistance and, if distance is large enough, curvature of the Earth affects the path as well.What is the difference between a parabolic path and projectile motion.?
In a vacuum for point projectiles in an uniform gravitational field, there is no difference.
Edit: The other answers given here are correct. Projectile motion can follow a wide variety of paths, of which the parabola is just a special type. For example, if a rocket is launched above escape velocity from the Earth, it could follow a quite complicated path throughout the solar system if it passes by planets closely enough.window tinting superchips
When the football travels through the air, it always follows a curved, or parabolic, path because the movement of the ball in the vertical direction is influenced by the force of gravity. As the ball travels up, gravity slows it down until it stops briefly at its peak height; the ball then comes down, and gravity accelerates it until it hits the ground. This is the path of any object that is launched or thrown (football, arrow, ballistic missile) and is called projectile motion.What is the difference between a parabolic path and projectile motion.?Projectile motion is what it sounds like--the motion of a projectile.
If there are no forces on the projectile other than a constant weight (which is a reasonable approximation in many cases), then its path will be a parabola--its horizontal position will be be proportional to time, and its vertical position will be a quadratic function of time, and therefore of horizontal position.
An example of a projectile with a non-parabolic path would be a ballistic missile--once it burns out and clears the atmosphere, it follows an elliptical path until it re-enters.What is the difference between a parabolic path and projectile motion.?Projectile motion is an example of a parabolic path. It can be shown that the vertical position of the football as a function of the football's horizontal position is a quadratic.
In the horizontal direction, the football moves at constant velocity:
x = vcos胃 t
t = x / vcos胃
In the vertical direction, the football undergoes constant acceleration:
y = vsin胃 (t) - 陆g(t)虏
using the result above:
y = vsin胃 (x / vcos胃) - 陆g(x / vcos胃)虏
y = (tan胃) x - (g / 2(vcos胃)虏) x虏
Projectile motion is an example of a parabolic path.What is the difference between a parabolic path and projectile motion.?Parabola is a mathematical curve - an abstract concept. Projectile trajectory is a real curve - traced by a moving object.
Projectiles are said to follow parabolic path as a first approximation to their true motion. Real motions are influenced by air resistance and, if distance is large enough, curvature of the Earth affects the path as well.What is the difference between a parabolic path and projectile motion.?
In a vacuum for point projectiles in an uniform gravitational field, there is no difference.
Edit: The other answers given here are correct. Projectile motion can follow a wide variety of paths, of which the parabola is just a special type. For example, if a rocket is launched above escape velocity from the Earth, it could follow a quite complicated path throughout the solar system if it passes by planets closely enough.
What is a motion for summary judgment in court of common pleas?
I received a copy of a letter sent to clerk of court in my hometown asking for a motion hearing concerning an old credit card debt for $2093.74. I am worried sick about this. I am 78 years old, on disability. I own my home but it's listed as a Homestead exemption. What's going to happen to me? What would happen if I didn't show up? I can't afford a lawyer. Please help!!!What is a motion for summary judgment in court of common pleas?The most important question is: How old is the debt?
Each state has a statute of limitations on how long a creditor has to sue you. If it's say, 4 yrs, and you know it's been much longer, you should tell the court just that. Get a copy of your credit reports and submit them to prove they're over the statute of limitations and have no legal recourse.
No matter what, you should always appear in court. Especially, if they give you further opportunity to defend yourself.
The worst case scenario is they win judgment and you make payment arrangements and a negative mark on your credit reports.
If you're worried about garnishment or bank levies, don't be. Even if you have direct deposit, Social Security Disability is exempt.
While it's not necessary, you can always contact your legal aid office to seek counsel. The cost should be minimal if not free.
Keep your chin up!What is a motion for summary judgment in court of common pleas?
I think it means that the credit card company wants the court to make a judgement without going through all the nonsense of setting court dates and then asking for extensions of time and preparing the case.
They are telling the judge that the case is so cut and dried that they want the judgement immediately.
The worst thing that could happen is the court says ya you owe the money. But it still doesn't mean you have to pay it. If you're broke and have no assets then they can't squeeze blood out of a turnip. In that case the credit card company really won't care that much because with a judgement against you they can just write it off their taxes as uncollectable.
If you owe the money, I'm afraid you should really try to pay it.What is a motion for summary judgment in court of common pleas?This is most likely what you will see in the court. The court will be packed with dozens of individuals like you. In the front rows there will be a few attorneys seated. When the judge comes in he will make a blanket statement that "you have been called here because you owe money to some of the creditors. The lawyers in front are representing the creditors. They will be making arrangements for you to pay off this debt. If you do not agree with the arrangements suggested by the lawyer you can come and see me." The Judge will then return to his chambers. You then will be talking to the lawyers.
Please don't be afraid. This is not the end of the world yet.What is a motion for summary judgment in court of common pleas?
This means the collection agency for the credit card company is going to sue you. I know it may be difficult but there is some research you should do.
Your first step is to find out what the statute of limitations in your state is and see if that time has passed. I have include a direct link to the list of states below as well as to the homepage of that website to help your research get started.
So, you read the website and have found that your account is past the statute of limitations. Contact your local clerk of courts and inform them you would like to enter an Intent to Defend. This will send a letter to you and the collection agency saying you intend to defend your case. At this point, they will usually drop the case if it is past the statute. If they do not drop it, you will need to appear in court and explain that it is past your state's statute of limitations(the time they have to sue you)
If it's within the statue of limitations, you should still appear in court. Explain your circumstances and go from there.
There will not be a big group of people or group of lawyers in court. The judge will not simply say you have to pay. He or she will listen to the facts of the case.
With your homestead exemption and what you've told us, it's very unlikely they would be able to really do anything with the judgement; however, they may still pursue one.
I also suggest doing a search for legal aid on google. Due to your circumstances, you may be able to get an attorney to help you without a charge. Your local senior center or public assistance office should have information on free legal help as well.
Don't let this get you too upset though. I know that's easy to say and hard to do but it won't help. The best thing to do is learn your rights and learn where you can go for help and it should work out fine.What is a motion for summary judgment in court of common pleas?I'm assuming that the credit card was unsecured. If so, even if the credit card company gets the judgement against you, they can't really do much. They cannot file against your house. They can't take your disability. However, if you do have any bank accounts/saving accounts or checking accounts with money in them, they can garnish those (I think)
Each state has a statute of limitations on how long a creditor has to sue you. If it's say, 4 yrs, and you know it's been much longer, you should tell the court just that. Get a copy of your credit reports and submit them to prove they're over the statute of limitations and have no legal recourse.
No matter what, you should always appear in court. Especially, if they give you further opportunity to defend yourself.
The worst case scenario is they win judgment and you make payment arrangements and a negative mark on your credit reports.
If you're worried about garnishment or bank levies, don't be. Even if you have direct deposit, Social Security Disability is exempt.
While it's not necessary, you can always contact your legal aid office to seek counsel. The cost should be minimal if not free.
Keep your chin up!What is a motion for summary judgment in court of common pleas?
I think it means that the credit card company wants the court to make a judgement without going through all the nonsense of setting court dates and then asking for extensions of time and preparing the case.
They are telling the judge that the case is so cut and dried that they want the judgement immediately.
The worst thing that could happen is the court says ya you owe the money. But it still doesn't mean you have to pay it. If you're broke and have no assets then they can't squeeze blood out of a turnip. In that case the credit card company really won't care that much because with a judgement against you they can just write it off their taxes as uncollectable.
If you owe the money, I'm afraid you should really try to pay it.What is a motion for summary judgment in court of common pleas?This is most likely what you will see in the court. The court will be packed with dozens of individuals like you. In the front rows there will be a few attorneys seated. When the judge comes in he will make a blanket statement that "you have been called here because you owe money to some of the creditors. The lawyers in front are representing the creditors. They will be making arrangements for you to pay off this debt. If you do not agree with the arrangements suggested by the lawyer you can come and see me." The Judge will then return to his chambers. You then will be talking to the lawyers.
Please don't be afraid. This is not the end of the world yet.What is a motion for summary judgment in court of common pleas?
This means the collection agency for the credit card company is going to sue you. I know it may be difficult but there is some research you should do.
Your first step is to find out what the statute of limitations in your state is and see if that time has passed. I have include a direct link to the list of states below as well as to the homepage of that website to help your research get started.
So, you read the website and have found that your account is past the statute of limitations. Contact your local clerk of courts and inform them you would like to enter an Intent to Defend. This will send a letter to you and the collection agency saying you intend to defend your case. At this point, they will usually drop the case if it is past the statute. If they do not drop it, you will need to appear in court and explain that it is past your state's statute of limitations(the time they have to sue you)
If it's within the statue of limitations, you should still appear in court. Explain your circumstances and go from there.
There will not be a big group of people or group of lawyers in court. The judge will not simply say you have to pay. He or she will listen to the facts of the case.
With your homestead exemption and what you've told us, it's very unlikely they would be able to really do anything with the judgement; however, they may still pursue one.
I also suggest doing a search for legal aid on google. Due to your circumstances, you may be able to get an attorney to help you without a charge. Your local senior center or public assistance office should have information on free legal help as well.
Don't let this get you too upset though. I know that's easy to say and hard to do but it won't help. The best thing to do is learn your rights and learn where you can go for help and it should work out fine.What is a motion for summary judgment in court of common pleas?I'm assuming that the credit card was unsecured. If so, even if the credit card company gets the judgement against you, they can't really do much. They cannot file against your house. They can't take your disability. However, if you do have any bank accounts/saving accounts or checking accounts with money in them, they can garnish those (I think)
What drives the motion of the plates on the earth?,geophysical and geochemical evidence for mantle convection?
What drives the motion of the plates on the earth?,geophysical and geochemical evidence exists for mantle convection? Is the whole mantle convecting or just part of it?What drives the motion of the plates on the earth?,geophysical and geochemical evidence for mantle convection?Of all the factors affecting the movement of a tectonic plate, it is indeed SLAB PULL that has by far the most significant influence.
Pink.(BSc Geology)What drives the motion of the plates on the earth?,geophysical and geochemical evidence for mantle convection?well i thought that last year it was established that the main force of plate motion is slab pull...What drives the motion of the plates on the earth?,geophysical and geochemical evidence for mantle convection?try to picture a volcano that is level with ground, ....... now it just lets out a slow continual flow. now picture that volcano just under the division of two separate plates.as this "volcano" is spewing the lava and moving the plate so slowly like1/8th of an inch a year an that is it but the proof it there is differently charged volcanic rock and +=positive -=negative and v=the part of the volcano where the lava comes out.
++--++--++--++V++--++--++--
see notic how the pattern is the same? well that is the way it is
Im pretty sure that is how it works
Pink.(BSc Geology)What drives the motion of the plates on the earth?,geophysical and geochemical evidence for mantle convection?well i thought that last year it was established that the main force of plate motion is slab pull...What drives the motion of the plates on the earth?,geophysical and geochemical evidence for mantle convection?try to picture a volcano that is level with ground, ....... now it just lets out a slow continual flow. now picture that volcano just under the division of two separate plates.as this "volcano" is spewing the lava and moving the plate so slowly like1/8th of an inch a year an that is it but the proof it there is differently charged volcanic rock and +=positive -=negative and v=the part of the volcano where the lava comes out.
++--++--++--++V++--++--++--
see notic how the pattern is the same? well that is the way it is
Im pretty sure that is how it works
What does it mean when a prosecutor files a "motion to amend criminal information"?
my ex got charged with retail theft but they graded the charge as an m2. The day of the pre trial conference, the DA filed this motion. I'm just curious to know what it means. Any help would be appreciated thanks ps it's in pennsylvaniaWhat does it mean when a prosecutor files a "motion to amend criminal information"?It means the DA has more information or different information than in the original document, and needs to amend the document to be accurate.What does it mean when a prosecutor files a "motion to amend criminal information"?The "criminal information" is the charging document, like an indictment. The prosecutor is asking for leave to change something about the documents that lists the charges.
What could be causing the videos from my camcorder to play in slow motion on my computer?
It plays back in regular motion when I play the video back on the camcorder, but it plays in slow motion on the computer screen in realplayer and windows media player.Can you help?What could be causing the videos from my camcorder to play in slow motion on my computer?Do all videos play slow on your computer, or only ones from your camcorder?
If they all do, it sounds like your machine is either in need of a faster CPU, it needs more RAM, or you have viruses or spyware that is slowing it down. You could try defragging the hard drive, clearing unncessary cookies, uninstalling unused software, and running Spybot to find any bugs.
If it is only video from the camcorder, then it sounds like a codec issue. What video format are the files? I suggest downloading VideoLan VLC media player and attempting to play the files through it. Often times, it can play videos better than WMP.
If they all do, it sounds like your machine is either in need of a faster CPU, it needs more RAM, or you have viruses or spyware that is slowing it down. You could try defragging the hard drive, clearing unncessary cookies, uninstalling unused software, and running Spybot to find any bugs.
If it is only video from the camcorder, then it sounds like a codec issue. What video format are the files? I suggest downloading VideoLan VLC media player and attempting to play the files through it. Often times, it can play videos better than WMP.
What is the motion of a charged particle in the presence of a magnetic field?
What determines the direction of motion and the path's radius?What is the motion of a charged particle in the presence of a magnetic field?the motion of a charged particle will move magntic south to magnetic north,due to the magnetic north is the source,and the magnetic south is the releaseing point of energy.Just like magnets.Just as the same resons that fallen powerlines trip reclosers,the power wants to go back to the source.The source is like this...look at it like a proton.A proton gives up electrons to fill in gaps lossed by other protons during emf.a charge to a element causes electrons to release,it forces the protons to give up energy so that it(potential energy)in this case a charged electron particle can take it's place.Well the released energy moves to the next proton,and it pushes out the forced amount of energy to replace the it's loss in its valaence shell,and the process continues,thus you have a magnetic field.
the paths radius is due to the amount of voltage that pushes the current flow,and the conductivity of the material. the vector of it ,and all electrical energy produced is magnitude,and direction.What is the motion of a charged particle in the presence of a magnetic field?2 pointscatalytic converter utah weather
the paths radius is due to the amount of voltage that pushes the current flow,and the conductivity of the material. the vector of it ,and all electrical energy produced is magnitude,and direction.What is the motion of a charged particle in the presence of a magnetic field?2 points
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)